Steam isnt without problems, banning anime games and allowing dozens of trash game releases every day. They still have to play by the rules of the banks and payment processors.
Gabe is a democrat, but hes not totally retarded. He is a fat, white neckbeard. He has gamer roots. Diversity is the fastest way to get trouble and lots of headaches.
Funny thing is Valve is super inconsistent on what it bans. There are several games on Steam that are not banned that are way creepier than anime tiddies.
Don't worry, you're next, and we won't be there to defend you.
What'll it be? Christianity? That's offensive to the woke. We could ban that, make sure they feel comfortable with the bans, just like you do now.
It's a culture war, pick a side. Are you pro-censorship, or anti-censorship? It's not "of what?", it's in general for all legal things. If you think Japanese games should be illegal, sure, lobby for it, but don't advocate censorship of legal material.
I wonder why some are so against the principle of "Don't like it, don't buy it". No one is forcing you to buy games you consider to be morally reprehensible. You can tune your preferences on Steam so that such games won't be recommended to you.
It's an easy comparison: It's printed material that some people find great comfort in, some don't care either way, while others believe it to be distasteful and in need of removal. You're afraid of Japanese people drawing cartoon women, and just the same, some atheists are afraid of the bible. (in the woke, "-phobic" sense)
The content actually doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is people's reactions to the content. Some half-god guy in a black leather book saying "slaves should be well-behaved, and pay your taxes on time", or some big titty half-demon grill in a black leather outfit saying it, either way, it's the same. The only real thing of importance in the conversation is if 1% of the population who happen to have high roles in media influence believe it to be "offensive", and if the 99% will give them precedent and power.
Steam isnt without problems, banning anime games and allowing dozens of trash game releases every day. They still have to play by the rules of the banks and payment processors.
Gabe is a democrat, but hes not totally retarded. He is a fat, white neckbeard. He has gamer roots. Diversity is the fastest way to get trouble and lots of headaches.
I’m sorry some of your precious anime tiddies got banned.
You should be!
Funny thing is Valve is super inconsistent on what it bans. There are several games on Steam that are not banned that are way creepier than anime tiddies.
Like The Last Of Us 2!
Don't worry, you're next, and we won't be there to defend you.
What'll it be? Christianity? That's offensive to the woke. We could ban that, make sure they feel comfortable with the bans, just like you do now.
It's a culture war, pick a side. Are you pro-censorship, or anti-censorship? It's not "of what?", it's in general for all legal things. If you think Japanese games should be illegal, sure, lobby for it, but don't advocate censorship of legal material.
I wonder why some are so against the principle of "Don't like it, don't buy it". No one is forcing you to buy games you consider to be morally reprehensible. You can tune your preferences on Steam so that such games won't be recommended to you.
I don’t need the defense of weebs. And equating Christianity to underage anime girls with big tiddies? LOL
It's an easy comparison: It's printed material that some people find great comfort in, some don't care either way, while others believe it to be distasteful and in need of removal. You're afraid of Japanese people drawing cartoon women, and just the same, some atheists are afraid of the bible. (in the woke, "-phobic" sense)
The content actually doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is people's reactions to the content. Some half-god guy in a black leather book saying "slaves should be well-behaved, and pay your taxes on time", or some big titty half-demon grill in a black leather outfit saying it, either way, it's the same. The only real thing of importance in the conversation is if 1% of the population who happen to have high roles in media influence believe it to be "offensive", and if the 99% will give them precedent and power.