Nah. They want eastern Europe for themselves, so they'll be sending just enough support to Ukraine to keep them in the fight, so that as many east Slavs as possible end up killing each other. As Graham said recently, they'll fight to the last Ukrainian.
Correct; however, Russia using nukes actually helps them in their plans.
Russia wants Ukraine for themselves and have been going out of their way to not terrorize the people or destroy everything in their conquest. If Russia used nukes, it would be tactical nukes to take out key targets easier and demoralize the Ukrainian military's resistance, it wouldn't be done as an Armageddon end of world scenario.
However, The West would immediately respond as if Russia was threatening the end of the world so they'd call all their meetings and double-down on the importance of the Ukraine war. Send more weapons, tanks, bombs, whatever to increase maximum death upon the Ukrainians. Meanwhile, The West would stall in their meetings to not immediately go to war by going through proper channels. Getting their democracies to "vote on it", etc... Thus accomplishing a few things. One, it would give Ukraine hope that the west was coming to save them and bolden them to take bigger risks which could help eliminate them faster etc... The West can also make false promises, give them a little help here or there to keep them dying and then only when the time is right, The West swoops in for themselves and they'll have the entire backing of their people to do whatever they wanted to.
Lol, pretty sure most aren't downvoting it because they're pro-nuclear war, they're just downvoting because Imp's using even potential nuclear apocalypse as an excuse to launch into another unhinged tangential tirade about some random woman instead.
The whole "you can't disagree with our retarded ideas because we virtue signalled about this bad thing at the same time" is retarded bullshit and you should probably feel bad once you've finished chewing your next crayon.
"Some random woman". Are you playing stupid or are you really that uninformed?
Novakovic, pussy or not, is a CIA asset and presided over a top 5 Military Industrial Complex weapons manufacturer during record profit years.
General Dynamics actively lobbies for more military spending and pro war policies. It has profiteered from every war from the gulf, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya. It is a preferred weapons dealer for the Saudi in their illegal war in Yemen.
You are simping for a war criminal just because she has a cunt.
"this one woman executive at this one defence contractor directly profiting far less than half a dozen other big players, like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, is the real mastermind behind this war. Not just one replaceable cog no more valuable than many others turning the military industrial gargant.
Anyone who disagrees with this assessment obviously just wants some of her caustic old cunt, and doesn't just have a bare minimum grasp on reality or the proportions of power involved in this conflict."
Constantly bitches at men for not agreeing with schizo posts.
I think you've misread the "100%" that was integral to the delusion charge. I didn't say >0%, and I don't know why finding one person doing something justifies saying the entire internet is secretly conspiring against you.
I don't think we will send tanks for a long time. It takes too long to train people and develop the logistics, months at least. Bradleys are much faster to get into use and almost as capable under the circumstances, so those made more sense.
I don't think we should send tanks at all, and just let them have more artillery ammunition & ATACMS. I don't think Ukraine is going to be able to put together a real maneuver division that can fight on the NATO level and be able to launch something like a breakthrough attack. Sure they can put something together, but it won't function like a NATO division, it will be slavs human waving themselves and taking heavy casualties.
Hint: The (((Americans))) want nuclear war.
Nah. They want eastern Europe for themselves, so they'll be sending just enough support to Ukraine to keep them in the fight, so that as many east Slavs as possible end up killing each other. As Graham said recently, they'll fight to the last Ukrainian.
Correct; however, Russia using nukes actually helps them in their plans.
Russia wants Ukraine for themselves and have been going out of their way to not terrorize the people or destroy everything in their conquest. If Russia used nukes, it would be tactical nukes to take out key targets easier and demoralize the Ukrainian military's resistance, it wouldn't be done as an Armageddon end of world scenario.
However, The West would immediately respond as if Russia was threatening the end of the world so they'd call all their meetings and double-down on the importance of the Ukraine war. Send more weapons, tanks, bombs, whatever to increase maximum death upon the Ukrainians. Meanwhile, The West would stall in their meetings to not immediately go to war by going through proper channels. Getting their democracies to "vote on it", etc... Thus accomplishing a few things. One, it would give Ukraine hope that the west was coming to save them and bolden them to take bigger risks which could help eliminate them faster etc... The West can also make false promises, give them a little help here or there to keep them dying and then only when the time is right, The West swoops in for themselves and they'll have the entire backing of their people to do whatever they wanted to.
If only the creature in charge of GD was male. The whole war in Ukraine could have been avoided.
So far, 4 cucks are simping for "muh Ukraine" and a proxy war with a nuclear super power.
The pussy worshiping is strong.
As of right now there are 3 other people in the comments excepting you and imp. And one of them is squarely blaming "(((Americans)))".
Who taught you to count?
Ah, right, so he shares the same rare delusion as you that all dissent is 100% feminist co-conspirator infiltrators.
No one mentioned feminism or called you anything.
Just pointing out the level of cuckage one most descend to down vote an anti nuclear war post.
And you are a fucking idiot if you need to have down vote counts explained to you (like in Imp's reply to you).
BTW, now 9 cucks are simping for "muh Ukraine" and a proxy war with a nuclear super power.
Lol, pretty sure most aren't downvoting it because they're pro-nuclear war, they're just downvoting because Imp's using even potential nuclear apocalypse as an excuse to launch into another unhinged tangential tirade about some random woman instead.
The whole "you can't disagree with our retarded ideas because we virtue signalled about this bad thing at the same time" is retarded bullshit and you should probably feel bad once you've finished chewing your next crayon.
"Some random woman". Are you playing stupid or are you really that uninformed?
Novakovic, pussy or not, is a CIA asset and presided over a top 5 Military Industrial Complex weapons manufacturer during record profit years.
General Dynamics actively lobbies for more military spending and pro war policies. It has profiteered from every war from the gulf, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya. It is a preferred weapons dealer for the Saudi in their illegal war in Yemen.
You are simping for a war criminal just because she has a cunt.
You. Are. An. Idiot.
Yadda yadda,
"this one woman executive at this one defence contractor directly profiting far less than half a dozen other big players, like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, is the real mastermind behind this war. Not just one replaceable cog no more valuable than many others turning the military industrial gargant.
Anyone who disagrees with this assessment obviously just wants some of her caustic old cunt, and doesn't just have a bare minimum grasp on reality or the proportions of power involved in this conflict."
Absolutely deranged.
I think you've misread the "100%" that was integral to the delusion charge. I didn't say >0%, and I don't know why finding one person doing something justifies saying the entire internet is secretly conspiring against you.
I don't think we will send tanks for a long time. It takes too long to train people and develop the logistics, months at least. Bradleys are much faster to get into use and almost as capable under the circumstances, so those made more sense.
I don't think we should send tanks at all, and just let them have more artillery ammunition & ATACMS. I don't think Ukraine is going to be able to put together a real maneuver division that can fight on the NATO level and be able to launch something like a breakthrough attack. Sure they can put something together, but it won't function like a NATO division, it will be slavs human waving themselves and taking heavy casualties.