What I said was that the alleged Islamic rape epidemic is not real, that changes to rape law in those countries to "yes means yes" to appease women caused the increase, not the immigration.
How do you explain other crimes becoming much much higher in areas full of Muslim immigrants? Vandalism, muggings, them attacking people for other random reasons (beating up men, beating up homosexuals, attacking people for walking dogs, etc.), child rape, terror attacks, etc.?
Women did not fake all the European terror attacks at concerts, festivals, Christmas markets. Those attacks weren't a thing before Muslims in most of Europe, you know.
It's Imp, he'd prefer Genghis Khan to Mary Magdalene.
This is why I view less and less of Imp's stuff. Maybe he does have a point, but I have to work so hard to compensate for his bias in areas he's just not capable of being objective that it's rarely worth the bother.
But it's a weird hypothetical, not at all based on the data I presented.
Besides, my answer is nil. There are people who don't have work, there's no need to bring in more. It's more concerning that thousands of the class that are prioritized for work are being brought in with no hope of them being removed.
Ukranians are ok, better than Africans for sure. And there is more possibility that eventually many of them would return home. +they're mostly Christian Europeans already.
Quality refugees and at this point, real legitimate refugees.
You only care because it's whamen. And, again, it's a warzone. It makes sense that refugees would spike. Whether or not they should be allowed in is a separate issue, of course. Still doesn't compare to refugees from India, Pakistan, or Poland. Not sure why you're focusing on Africa, since it was never at the very top.
This is weaksauce, and you're just pissed because whamen. Heck, as far as refugees go, whamen from a white, Christian nation are going to be far less disruptive than fighting age males from almost anywhere.
Considering how overrun the UK already is, importing Ukrainian women is probably a net positive, actually.
It's a warzone that they created. Also, there are about 20 countries closer to Ukraine than the UK is. Why don't they all go to Poland and places like that? Oh, they're not feminist enough. They treat men slightly better than rabid animals, no way women would want to go there.
Heck, as far as refugees go, whamen from a white, Christian nation are going to be far less disruptive than fighting age males from almost anywhere.
What planet do you live on? They are going to be more disruptive, because they will have a permanent effect on demographics. They're never going back to Ukraine, they like living in the feminist dystopia that is the UK. They will permanently change the political landscape there, especially if they're being placed in areas where feminism doesn't have as tight of a grip on society.
Edit : I also forgot to mention that British-born young men are struggling to get work due to the gender discrimination in hiring, so importing many thousands more of the privileged class will make their lives even worse.
Aside from the proximity to an active warzone, the only countries more zogged than the US are Ukraine and the UK. I imagine the UK is incentivising it.
Imp, gun to your head would you rather have millions of violent brown men imported into your country, or a few hundred thousand White women?
I think I remember him making excuses for muslim terrorists. According to him, women caused it.
What I said was that the alleged Islamic rape epidemic is not real, that changes to rape law in those countries to "yes means yes" to appease women caused the increase, not the immigration.
How do you explain other crimes becoming much much higher in areas full of Muslim immigrants? Vandalism, muggings, them attacking people for other random reasons (beating up men, beating up homosexuals, attacking people for walking dogs, etc.), child rape, terror attacks, etc.?
Women did not fake all the European terror attacks at concerts, festivals, Christmas markets. Those attacks weren't a thing before Muslims in most of Europe, you know.
It's Imp, he'd prefer Genghis Khan to Mary Magdalene.
This is why I view less and less of Imp's stuff. Maybe he does have a point, but I have to work so hard to compensate for his bias in areas he's just not capable of being objective that it's rarely worth the bother.
You're just making up the numbers. The number of brown men coming in is significantly lower in reality.
I know I’m making up numbers, it’s a hypothetical.
But it's a weird hypothetical, not at all based on the data I presented.
Besides, my answer is nil. There are people who don't have work, there's no need to bring in more. It's more concerning that thousands of the class that are prioritized for work are being brought in with no hope of them being removed.
I'm shocked the UK would allow white people in
Ukranians are ok, better than Africans for sure. And there is more possibility that eventually many of them would return home. +they're mostly Christian Europeans already.
Quality refugees and at this point, real legitimate refugees.
this is some serious copium you're on.
You only care because it's whamen. And, again, it's a warzone. It makes sense that refugees would spike. Whether or not they should be allowed in is a separate issue, of course. Still doesn't compare to refugees from India, Pakistan, or Poland. Not sure why you're focusing on Africa, since it was never at the very top.
This is weaksauce, and you're just pissed because whamen. Heck, as far as refugees go, whamen from a white, Christian nation are going to be far less disruptive than fighting age males from almost anywhere.
Considering how overrun the UK already is, importing Ukrainian women is probably a net positive, actually.
It's a warzone that they created. Also, there are about 20 countries closer to Ukraine than the UK is. Why don't they all go to Poland and places like that? Oh, they're not feminist enough. They treat men slightly better than rabid animals, no way women would want to go there.
What planet do you live on? They are going to be more disruptive, because they will have a permanent effect on demographics. They're never going back to Ukraine, they like living in the feminist dystopia that is the UK. They will permanently change the political landscape there, especially if they're being placed in areas where feminism doesn't have as tight of a grip on society.
Edit : I also forgot to mention that British-born young men are struggling to get work due to the gender discrimination in hiring, so importing many thousands more of the privileged class will make their lives even worse.
Aside from the proximity to an active warzone, the only countries more zogged than the US are Ukraine and the UK. I imagine the UK is incentivising it.
Albanians, Ukrainians, Pakis...I'm starting to see a pattern here. Anyone seen Steven Seagal lately?
Most UK men love the idea of a bunch of white Ukrainian women coming into the UK. It might be the best thing to happen to the UK in over a century.
It really isn't. It'll be like Brexit. Women stealing a ton of power while the politicians play misdirection to hide it.
Men have 0 political power anyway because the majority of men are simps. If you want positive change you need to use force.
Figures for Channel crossings from January 2022 to January 2023.
It's actually even more one sided, because the government stopped updating the figures for Ukrainians arriving in June 2022.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-year-ending-june-2022/statistics-on-ukrainians-in-the-uk