A frenly schizophrenic frog once observed, "I'm not saying our best option is 30 guys on a mountain starting a several hundred year long campaign to retake the West, but it's a better plan than vote harder."
The calls for revolution are tiresome. I've yet to see anyone willing or capable of leading such an effort who actually understand what it entails, much less anyone with the vision for what comes after. 30 guys on a mountain ain't gonna cut it. There are still options on the table besides "vote harder". The hard work might not be fun but it's a heck of a lot more pleasant than what a violent revolution would entail. It may still come to that at some point, but anyone eager for a revolution doesn't understand what it involves.
've yet to see anyone willing or capable of leading such an effort who actually understand what it entails,
Not even "what it entails" (by which I assume you mean what the results would be, as results of the revolution are almost always bad), but even "how to do it".
Continuing to bang ones head against a wall after 80 years of the wall only getting harder is demoralizing. One must acknowledge that operating within the confines of a system conciously engineered for your destruction is a losing strategy. Patiently waiting on the couch for some messiah to come along that only requires you to check a box in a voting booth is paralyzing. Recognizing that you must be an unrestrained agent of order in a world of chaos should be a revitalizing feeling for Faustian Man.
Blame Yuri Bezmenov for stating the obvious fact that revolutions only happen when enough elites agree with the cause. You literally just have to look at the American Revolution to see this in action, the Founders aside from Ben Franklin were the richest, and all of them were the most influential people in the 13 colonies.
the confines of a system conciously engineered for your destruction
This is so obviously the agenda of the Democrats, I don't know why it doesn't get more press in right-wing circles. Making DC and Puerto Rico states, pandering to illegal immigrants, threats to pack the supreme court- they're all pieces and a plan designed to permanently neuter Republican political power.
I think the Democrats honestly believe that if they can get a permanent 51%+ majority everyone is just going to have to shrug and take it while they outlaw guns, run white males out of the workforce, and teach your five-year-old that they should cut their dick off in school.
What they seem completely oblivious to is the fact that the prospect of the South becoming a permanently disenfranchised political underclass is what prompted the Civil War. Yes, it was about economics and about slavery, but if you look at how aggressively they debated whether new states entering the union would be free or slave in the years leading up to 1861, it was fundamentally about whether or not the slave states would have enough representation to safeguard their interests. When it became clear that they were going to lose that battle long-term, they decided to peace-out. Why the Democrats think it would be any different in the 21st century is beyond me.
I don't think they're really afraid of a second Civil War. They fantasize about it all the time. They're afraid of it like women are afraid of The Handmaids Tale in real life. Also the South lost the civil war and the left is sure if it happens again they will stamp us out for good.
It's not blackpilled to lack faith in the GOP. If anything, having faith in them is the pathway to a lot of depression and anxiety when they inevitably "fail" at doing the things you were duped into believing they wanted to do.
A frenly schizophrenic frog once observed, "I'm not saying our best option is 30 guys on a mountain starting a several hundred year long campaign to retake the West, but it's a better plan than vote harder."
The calls for revolution are tiresome. I've yet to see anyone willing or capable of leading such an effort who actually understand what it entails, much less anyone with the vision for what comes after. 30 guys on a mountain ain't gonna cut it. There are still options on the table besides "vote harder". The hard work might not be fun but it's a heck of a lot more pleasant than what a violent revolution would entail. It may still come to that at some point, but anyone eager for a revolution doesn't understand what it involves.
30 guys on a mountain is how the Reconquista started.
The Reconquista was not conducted against a highly militarized modern state. Hell, I think even the Russian Revolution would not be applicable.
Still a better plan than vote harder.
How does "a several hundred year long campaign" translate to "a violent revolution"?
Not even "what it entails" (by which I assume you mean what the results would be, as results of the revolution are almost always bad), but even "how to do it".
I really hate blackpilled idiots.
I am convinced some of you are undercover leftists sent here to demoralize the right into laying down and surrendering to despair.
Continuing to bang ones head against a wall after 80 years of the wall only getting harder is demoralizing. One must acknowledge that operating within the confines of a system conciously engineered for your destruction is a losing strategy. Patiently waiting on the couch for some messiah to come along that only requires you to check a box in a voting booth is paralyzing. Recognizing that you must be an unrestrained agent of order in a world of chaos should be a revitalizing feeling for Faustian Man.
Blame Yuri Bezmenov for stating the obvious fact that revolutions only happen when enough elites agree with the cause. You literally just have to look at the American Revolution to see this in action, the Founders aside from Ben Franklin were the richest, and all of them were the most influential people in the 13 colonies.
This is so obviously the agenda of the Democrats, I don't know why it doesn't get more press in right-wing circles. Making DC and Puerto Rico states, pandering to illegal immigrants, threats to pack the supreme court- they're all pieces and a plan designed to permanently neuter Republican political power.
I think the Democrats honestly believe that if they can get a permanent 51%+ majority everyone is just going to have to shrug and take it while they outlaw guns, run white males out of the workforce, and teach your five-year-old that they should cut their dick off in school.
What they seem completely oblivious to is the fact that the prospect of the South becoming a permanently disenfranchised political underclass is what prompted the Civil War. Yes, it was about economics and about slavery, but if you look at how aggressively they debated whether new states entering the union would be free or slave in the years leading up to 1861, it was fundamentally about whether or not the slave states would have enough representation to safeguard their interests. When it became clear that they were going to lose that battle long-term, they decided to peace-out. Why the Democrats think it would be any different in the 21st century is beyond me.
I don't think they're really afraid of a second Civil War. They fantasize about it all the time. They're afraid of it like women are afraid of The Handmaids Tale in real life. Also the South lost the civil war and the left is sure if it happens again they will stamp us out for good.
It's not blackpilled to lack faith in the GOP. If anything, having faith in them is the pathway to a lot of depression and anxiety when they inevitably "fail" at doing the things you were duped into believing they wanted to do.