It is obvious satire. I honestly thought it was written by OpenGPT until a few paragraphs in.
Write a New York Times article explaining how Argentina defeating France for the World Cup is white supremacy, sexist and biased against the Welsh.
On Sunday, Argentina defeated France to win their first-ever World Cup title, a victory that has sparked controversy and accusations of white supremacy, sexism, and bias against the Welsh.
The victory of Argentina over France is highly significant in the context of world football. It marks the first time that a South American team has won the World Cup, a feat long sought after by many in Argentina and throughout the continent. But, it is also a victory that has been met with criticism from some who argue that it is a result of a system of white supremacy, sexism and bias against the Welsh.
The accusations of white supremacy come from the fact that Argentina’s team is predominantly white. The team’s manager is also white, as is the majority of the coaching staff. This has led some to claim that Argentina’s victory is a result of a system of privilege that favors white players and coaches.
In addition, there have been accusations of sexism in Argentina’s victory. The team’s star player, Lionel Messi, was not even born in Argentina and was raised in Spain, yet he is the face of the team and has been credited with the team’s success. This has led to claims that Argentina’s success is a result of a patriarchal system that favors male players over female players.
Finally, there have been claims of bias against the Welsh. Despite the fact that Wales is part of the United Kingdom, which has won the World Cup three times, Wales has never even qualified for the tournament. This has led some to argue that there is an unfair bias against the Welsh that has enabled Argentina to win their first World Cup.
The accusations of white supremacy, sexism and bias against the Welsh in Argentina’s victory are serious, and it is clear that there is still much work to be done to ensure that the playing field is fair and equitable for all teams. Until then, the victory of Argentina will remain a contentious one.
It is obvious satire. I honestly thought it was written by OpenGPT until a few paragraphs in.
True but two things:
It gave me an opportunity to bash France, I always take those chances
Satire nowadays works like prophecy, give it a week, don't be surprised if NY Times says Argentina's win has links to nazism..
Honestly, this still doesn’t read like something written by a living, breathing, English-speaking human, even with the full thing, lol…
It’s like, if AI attempted to write “satire”, or something…
I guess that’s the vibe they were going for..?
The structure and style make it sound like something I'd write in high school for my English class as a non-native English speaker.