Haven't had Victoria 3 yet, but any time I try Communism on Tropico 3, it requires me to start a police state and deport all of my political enemies to keep the bloated welfare state afloat.
I've said it before, but it's worth repeating. The game doesn't allow for free-floating wages, so wage controls are defacto. I've nearly blown up my own economy because I forgot to manually give raises on occasion. The effort to desperately maintain universal healthcare, universal housing, and wage equality, requires me to intentionally destroy all but the most profitable industries, and have them run the entire economy. Anyone who is not profitable, needs to be removed.
This actually meant I had to bulldoze farms because farmers were way over-paid and had a cushy lifestyle compared to my oil industry, but if I did that, I'd get a revolution, so I had to round up the peasants and "deport" them first. Depopulating my island was a great idea in order to preserve the welfare state that had built up, since it was the only thing maintaining my political security. Wage equality required me to round up and kill dissidents and depopulate the island to keep my political security in check.
Victoria at least has some advantage in that regard as it does have free-floating wages (although like I said, it is currently unoptimized and due to be patched in the near future). But you as the government can institute wage controls and welfare....which I usually see as the moment people cite as their economies beginning to die, as wages get so high its virtually impossible to keep business profitable without subsides, which further eats into their profits and gold reserves.
So they have to start raising their taxes. And when that is not enough, they have to start taxing goods. And when that still isnt enough, they have to go get colonies, which pay taxes without using your institutions. And when that still isnt enough, you start looking at your neighbors to try and bring them into the fold, and....oh wait, this is all starting to sound very familiar.
Meanwhile, my Capitalist, Liberal society has profitable business, my workers are making just as much, if not more, money even without wage laws, welfare exist for a very select few of the population that deserve it (like the elderly), and even with taxes minimized I am still collecting more than I know what to do with because my Capitalist are funding everything due to their profits meaning I dont need to pay for construction. And of course, I am making a killing selling excess items for export, and importing what I lack.
Actually, I'd say it was either Cities Skylines or Democracy 3.
Cities Skylines can be pretty rough because it kind of ushers you towards a NeoLiberal Corporatist hellscape, especially with it's industries mod (where you, as the state, run entire industrial corporate colonies). Additionally, there's a lot of crazy controls over movement you have, and a lot of subtle mechanisms that make your horrific infrastructure plans profitable. This includes bulldozing all the roads and making literally everyone cycle from home to work, without anyone getting super pissed off. Or the fact that people will actively go hours out of their way to go to overly expensive parks.
Democracy 3 is a ridiculous game because of so many Neoliberal pre-suppositions. Increasing Armed Police doesn't decrease crime; it actually increases ARMED ROBBERIES. You know what increased armed robberies at a 1:1 scale? Lax gun control. Get this straight: unarmed police reduce all crime including armed robberies, but armed police and gun ownership causes them.
I got the Africa expansion to try out, and I took over some former communist, currently islamist, hellscape. In 7 years, I went from having coup threats, extreme crime, active race riots and sectarian murders, total poverty, and an AIDS crisis to: no crime, riots, sectarianism, or coups, but a continuing problem with AIDS... in Africa. Literally no crime. In 7 years, my approval rating went from 0% to... 0%. I SOLVED CRIME AND TURNED YOU INTO A MIDDLE-CLASS COUNTRY AND YOU WANT TO ASSASSINATE ME?!!
Fucking Duterte became massively popular with his "kill all the drug dealers in the street" program. Fucking Idi Aminate people and had support from at least 20% of the country!!!
Now I understand why Neo-Liberals are like "oh just let out all the criminals out!" It's because they literally can't imagine that rampant crime would effect their popularity.
On the other hand, it can be fun to go full gremlin mode and create a city in such a way that it would make your average Modernist NeoLiberal city planner want to pull his hair out (as much as the game will let you anyway).
My typical cities consist of:
Almost everywhere that can be accessed by mass transit can also be accessed by car. And any that cant will at least let you get close. And of course, the road network will not be hostile to motorist (multiple lanes, highways, good access, no reserved lanes, etc).
Extensive suburban and single-family housing for those who dont want to live in downtown apartments with the Bugmen.
Manufacturing jobs available in abundance for those who dont want to be an office drone downtown.
Power provided by reliable means, which means a mix of both "traditional" power (coal and oil), as well as reasonable renewables. This then goes out the window once Nuclear is unlocked and the grid becomes 100% nuclear.
Harsh enforcement of laws by an aggressive police force to keep the criminals in the slammer where they belong.
The main funded and endorsed universities are a Research University and a Trade School, because they are actually important.
If any of the above offends you, you can either live downtown with the Bugmen, or live in the district I dubbed the "Hippie Ghetto", where non-electric vehicles are banned, roads are hostile to motorist (take the tram you smelly Hippie!), housing is "eco-friendly", businesses are organic and social justice-minded, and its also where we dumped the Liberal Arts college. Oh, and I hope you like the additional 2% tax on your business and home for the trouble of stinking up my city, assmunch.
= literal libtard delusion simulator. The developers of that "game" are open about their left wing politics and rig their game so that unless you play it like you're AOC or Bernie, you'll fail.
I have to agree with you on this. Dealing with AIDS is the only time I got close to having any amount of popular support. Race riots, ethnic violence, and poverty were utterly rampant, but as long as I funded The Science enough, my approval went up. Nonsense.
includes bulldozing all the roads and making literally everyone cycle from home to work
I never actually played the Pete Buttigieg DLC.
Get this straight: unarmed police reduce all crime including armed robberies, but armed police and gun ownership causes them.
Guns cause crimes. What's so hard to understand? That's almost the entirety of the argument I get from anyone saying we need more gun laws. Guns kill people.
Fucking Idi Amin ate people and had support from at least 20% of the country!!!
Well... they say 20% of any population will always be cannibals. Give or take.
Yeah, the game literally has mechanisms to allow you to do that without destroying the city. It has to make everyone retarded to do it, but it does do it.
Get this straight: unarmed police reduce all crime including armed robberies, but armed police and gun ownership causes them.
They probably looked at some countries that have unarmed police, probably due to a traditional lack of armed crime, and then said "hah, these have less violence. Lack of guns must be the cause; not the effect."
This is interesting to me. I've never played a political simulator, but it sounds interesting. I've been playing Crusader Kings 3 which I'm led to believe is along those lines. I've been enjoying it which is funny because CK3 is a terrible combat game which is more along the lines of what I usually play.
Political simulators can be good, but this kind of thing is exactly why it's a problem. You actually need to have an honest understanding of politics in order for it to be fair. I wouldn't have a problem if the game said "your national political capital is weakened due to the formation of militias which may not conform with the government's demands", I get that. But you can't make a 1:1 claim that guns cause crime.
Haven't had Victoria 3 yet, but any time I try Communism on Tropico 3
I love tropico except the combat systems always suck. Tropico 6 is the current game.
I always smash the fuck out of my communist faction. I make my capitalists super happy, and shit all over the communists.
Stick their leaders and hard core followers into the Asylum to brainwash their communism away.
Drone strike their leaders and hard core followers after your Asylum is full.
Pick every choice that the communists hate and the capitalists love in terms of your government policies, which usually includes no free education or health care, you gotta pay for everything.
Build prisons and set them to Convict Labor then fill them with communists.
When you try to eliminate shacks & get everyone into cheap housing, this actually makes the communists super happy, so instead, try to focus on higher end housing and make sure higher paid citizens don't have to share housing types with the plebs.
"love it or leave it" so the commies you keep oppressing stay unhappy and emigrate.
The game doesn't allow for free-floating wages, so wage controls are defacto.
The game is literal socialism where you, El Presidente, have totalitarian control over everything. It isn't so much wage "controls" as you set the salary for the job offer. Citizens will take whatever job looks the best, so the pay grade is more of a priority slider. Critical jobs need higher pay to make sure they are filled. Less important jobs can be set to the minimum as an overflow.
I build tons of guard towers and leave them unstaffed, then when I'm attacked, I suddenly pump them up to max pay so everyone jumps into them and fights. It's an instant army. Worked great in T5 IIRC but in T6 guard towers are pretty shit.
This actually meant I had to bulldoze farms because farmers were way over-paid and had a cushy lifestyle compared to my oil industry, but if I did that, I'd get a revolution, so I had to round up the peasants and "deport" them first.
Well, farms can input into high profit supply chains, [sugar -> rum being a common early example] but in the late game its usually more efficient to have shit tons of ports and to simply import the raw materials so you can skip the farms entirely. Late game tropico economies = surrounding every square inch of your coastline with docks and importing MASSIVE amounts of raw materials, then using high profit factories to make weapons and cars and pharma and shit, then export that.
Depopulating my island was a great idea in order to preserve the welfare state that had built up, since it was the only thing maintaining my political security. Wage equality required me to round up and kill dissidents and depopulate the island to keep my political security in check.
Simply build for-profit prisons and stick all your excess population there. At one point on one of my islands I had like 12 full prisons with prison slave labor to absorb all the excess population.
Yeah, Tropico's combat is always pretty silly, but I'll deal with it as it's not the main mechanism of the game.
When you try to eliminate shacks & get everyone into cheap housing, this actually makes the communists super happy, so instead, try to focus on higher end housing and make sure higher paid citizens don't have to share housing types with the plebs.
Balancing housing out was always a difficult mechanism in the game. It needs to be close to their work, but it also needs to be cheap enough for them to live. I always kinda over-build housing because some people just don't want to pay (slightly) more money and live in a cheap nice place, and will instead demand to sleep in squalor. Making people not live in shacks is a real hassle.
Haven't had Victoria 3 yet, but any time I try Communism on Tropico 3, it requires me to start a police state and deport all of my political enemies to keep the bloated welfare state afloat.
Raz0rfist was right
I've said it before, but it's worth repeating. The game doesn't allow for free-floating wages, so wage controls are defacto. I've nearly blown up my own economy because I forgot to manually give raises on occasion. The effort to desperately maintain universal healthcare, universal housing, and wage equality, requires me to intentionally destroy all but the most profitable industries, and have them run the entire economy. Anyone who is not profitable, needs to be removed.
This actually meant I had to bulldoze farms because farmers were way over-paid and had a cushy lifestyle compared to my oil industry, but if I did that, I'd get a revolution, so I had to round up the peasants and "deport" them first. Depopulating my island was a great idea in order to preserve the welfare state that had built up, since it was the only thing maintaining my political security. Wage equality required me to round up and kill dissidents and depopulate the island to keep my political security in check.
Victoria at least has some advantage in that regard as it does have free-floating wages (although like I said, it is currently unoptimized and due to be patched in the near future). But you as the government can institute wage controls and welfare....which I usually see as the moment people cite as their economies beginning to die, as wages get so high its virtually impossible to keep business profitable without subsides, which further eats into their profits and gold reserves.
So they have to start raising their taxes. And when that is not enough, they have to start taxing goods. And when that still isnt enough, they have to go get colonies, which pay taxes without using your institutions. And when that still isnt enough, you start looking at your neighbors to try and bring them into the fold, and....oh wait, this is all starting to sound very familiar.
Meanwhile, my Capitalist, Liberal society has profitable business, my workers are making just as much, if not more, money even without wage laws, welfare exist for a very select few of the population that deserve it (like the elderly), and even with taxes minimized I am still collecting more than I know what to do with because my Capitalist are funding everything due to their profits meaning I dont need to pay for construction. And of course, I am making a killing selling excess items for export, and importing what I lack.
TIL the proponents of the Great Reset honed their skills in Tropico 3.
Actually, I'd say it was either Cities Skylines or Democracy 3.
Cities Skylines can be pretty rough because it kind of ushers you towards a NeoLiberal Corporatist hellscape, especially with it's industries mod (where you, as the state, run entire industrial corporate colonies). Additionally, there's a lot of crazy controls over movement you have, and a lot of subtle mechanisms that make your horrific infrastructure plans profitable. This includes bulldozing all the roads and making literally everyone cycle from home to work, without anyone getting super pissed off. Or the fact that people will actively go hours out of their way to go to overly expensive parks.
Democracy 3 is a ridiculous game because of so many Neoliberal pre-suppositions. Increasing Armed Police doesn't decrease crime; it actually increases ARMED ROBBERIES. You know what increased armed robberies at a 1:1 scale? Lax gun control. Get this straight: unarmed police reduce all crime including armed robberies, but armed police and gun ownership causes them.
I got the Africa expansion to try out, and I took over some former communist, currently islamist, hellscape. In 7 years, I went from having coup threats, extreme crime, active race riots and sectarian murders, total poverty, and an AIDS crisis to: no crime, riots, sectarianism, or coups, but a continuing problem with AIDS... in Africa. Literally no crime. In 7 years, my approval rating went from 0% to... 0%. I SOLVED CRIME AND TURNED YOU INTO A MIDDLE-CLASS COUNTRY AND YOU WANT TO ASSASSINATE ME?!!
Fucking Duterte became massively popular with his "kill all the drug dealers in the street" program. Fucking Idi Amin ate people and had support from at least 20% of the country!!!
Now I understand why Neo-Liberals are like "oh just let out all the criminals out!" It's because they literally can't imagine that rampant crime would effect their popularity.
On the other hand, it can be fun to go full gremlin mode and create a city in such a way that it would make your average Modernist NeoLiberal city planner want to pull his hair out (as much as the game will let you anyway).
My typical cities consist of:
Almost everywhere that can be accessed by mass transit can also be accessed by car. And any that cant will at least let you get close. And of course, the road network will not be hostile to motorist (multiple lanes, highways, good access, no reserved lanes, etc).
Extensive suburban and single-family housing for those who dont want to live in downtown apartments with the Bugmen.
Manufacturing jobs available in abundance for those who dont want to be an office drone downtown.
Power provided by reliable means, which means a mix of both "traditional" power (coal and oil), as well as reasonable renewables. This then goes out the window once Nuclear is unlocked and the grid becomes 100% nuclear.
Harsh enforcement of laws by an aggressive police force to keep the criminals in the slammer where they belong.
The main funded and endorsed universities are a Research University and a Trade School, because they are actually important.
If any of the above offends you, you can either live downtown with the Bugmen, or live in the district I dubbed the "Hippie Ghetto", where non-electric vehicles are banned, roads are hostile to motorist (take the tram you smelly Hippie!), housing is "eco-friendly", businesses are organic and social justice-minded, and its also where we dumped the Liberal Arts college. Oh, and I hope you like the additional 2% tax on your business and home for the trouble of stinking up my city, assmunch.
= literal libtard delusion simulator. The developers of that "game" are open about their left wing politics and rig their game so that unless you play it like you're AOC or Bernie, you'll fail.
I have to agree with you on this. Dealing with AIDS is the only time I got close to having any amount of popular support. Race riots, ethnic violence, and poverty were utterly rampant, but as long as I funded The Science enough, my approval went up. Nonsense.
I never actually played the Pete Buttigieg DLC.
Guns cause crimes. What's so hard to understand? That's almost the entirety of the argument I get from anyone saying we need more gun laws. Guns kill people.
Well... they say 20% of any population will always be cannibals. Give or take.
Yeah, the game literally has mechanisms to allow you to do that without destroying the city. It has to make everyone retarded to do it, but it does do it.
They probably looked at some countries that have unarmed police, probably due to a traditional lack of armed crime, and then said "hah, these have less violence. Lack of guns must be the cause; not the effect."
This is interesting to me. I've never played a political simulator, but it sounds interesting. I've been playing Crusader Kings 3 which I'm led to believe is along those lines. I've been enjoying it which is funny because CK3 is a terrible combat game which is more along the lines of what I usually play.
Political simulators can be good, but this kind of thing is exactly why it's a problem. You actually need to have an honest understanding of politics in order for it to be fair. I wouldn't have a problem if the game said "your national political capital is weakened due to the formation of militias which may not conform with the government's demands", I get that. But you can't make a 1:1 claim that guns cause crime.
I love tropico except the combat systems always suck. Tropico 6 is the current game.
I always smash the fuck out of my communist faction. I make my capitalists super happy, and shit all over the communists.
Stick their leaders and hard core followers into the Asylum to brainwash their communism away.
Drone strike their leaders and hard core followers after your Asylum is full.
Pick every choice that the communists hate and the capitalists love in terms of your government policies, which usually includes no free education or health care, you gotta pay for everything.
Build prisons and set them to Convict Labor then fill them with communists.
When you try to eliminate shacks & get everyone into cheap housing, this actually makes the communists super happy, so instead, try to focus on higher end housing and make sure higher paid citizens don't have to share housing types with the plebs.
"love it or leave it" so the commies you keep oppressing stay unhappy and emigrate.
The game is literal socialism where you, El Presidente, have totalitarian control over everything. It isn't so much wage "controls" as you set the salary for the job offer. Citizens will take whatever job looks the best, so the pay grade is more of a priority slider. Critical jobs need higher pay to make sure they are filled. Less important jobs can be set to the minimum as an overflow.
I build tons of guard towers and leave them unstaffed, then when I'm attacked, I suddenly pump them up to max pay so everyone jumps into them and fights. It's an instant army. Worked great in T5 IIRC but in T6 guard towers are pretty shit.
Well, farms can input into high profit supply chains, [sugar -> rum being a common early example] but in the late game its usually more efficient to have shit tons of ports and to simply import the raw materials so you can skip the farms entirely. Late game tropico economies = surrounding every square inch of your coastline with docks and importing MASSIVE amounts of raw materials, then using high profit factories to make weapons and cars and pharma and shit, then export that.
Simply build for-profit prisons and stick all your excess population there. At one point on one of my islands I had like 12 full prisons with prison slave labor to absorb all the excess population.
Yeah, Tropico's combat is always pretty silly, but I'll deal with it as it's not the main mechanism of the game.
Balancing housing out was always a difficult mechanism in the game. It needs to be close to their work, but it also needs to be cheap enough for them to live. I always kinda over-build housing because some people just don't want to pay (slightly) more money and live in a cheap nice place, and will instead demand to sleep in squalor. Making people not live in shacks is a real hassle.