So, ESG punishes CEOs for having sons?!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
I'd need to see more than just this snippet but if true then are they treating capitalism like monarchy? Just because you're the child of a successful business man doesn't mean you inherit the company, more occasions they get a trustfund but the company is left in more capable hands.
I think it's more along the lines that a daughter will make the CEO more malleable towards feminist goals.
I wish I could show you more but the article is paywalled.
I attended an ESG "webinar" and found out a lot of shit like this. A lot of my suspicions were confirmed.
Figures, put all the real shit behind a pay wall, like any cult, pyramid scheme or actually useful information on tax avoidance
I might try to get some books on ESG so I can post snippets here.
They paywall everything to make it harder to understand how it works, so it's harder to fight.
Thing is, investing in making better posts with this account is probably not worth it because of the stormcuck bots.
To be clear: you are choosing not to make better, more useful contributions to this forum because other users have correctly identified an overlap between radical feminism and Jewish power/critical race theory.
This is one of the most interesting things you’ve posted in a while. I think you should continue in this vein.
No, I'm choosing not to spend time and money researching for posts that will be heavily downvoted and not read by anyone.
Maybe I'll join Twitter. No downvotes on Elon's ego trip.
You could always just publish the details under an alternate alias on someplace like Substack.
Believe me, if the information's as juicy as you claim, you'll have instant traffic from a wide range of people the moment anyone's become aware of its availability.
Is there a direct link to the article? If anyone is able to find it on Google there may be a way to circumvent it.
This is the source that Bing claims the quote came from.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360739716_Do_female_CEOs_matter_for_ESG_scores
Method didn't work, but I found this for anyone else that's interested: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17302350 Which has a little more content that's not fully paywalled.
Well found. It has the full conclusion in plain text so they can't claim it's fake.
esg and "sustainability" is yet another thin coat of paint disguising the goals of marxism, just like every other "social movement" from the last 150 years or so
It never dies. They just rebrand it every decade or so, and all the retards keep buying in.
What if... and bear with me here.... what if my son was actually a daughter on paper so that I could get 9% more goypoints?
Do you lose 9% if your daughter identifies as male?
They are claiming that the CEO having a daughter is predictive of a higher Corporate Social Responsibility rating for the company.
Claiming this causation is certainly a step on the road to effectively punishing candidates who do not have a daughter.
The end goal is to make sure that the male candidates who are permitted to join the workforce are still highly compliant with and servile to the feminist agenda. If half of the workforce is to remain male, then it must be comprised of effete gays and soys.
And this is exactly why I'm sticking with MSG. It tastes way better.
/pol/ was right again.
I was better off not reading that thread.
You raise daughters to take care of you when you're old. Would you rather a man was your nurse?
Not necessarily. Childless CEOs also lack daughters.