I skimmed the article looking for the explanation of how two Gringott's goblin looking walking stereotype motherfuckers were 'darlings' of the alt right, and all they have is this ONE SENTENCE:
Some of her defenders, who call her “Queen Caroline,” are followers of Curtis Yarvin, a neoreactionary political theorist and far right darling.
That's all they've got, but they put it in the subheading, knowing 90% of people won't read any further.
I think he's a scapegoat. Who was enabling him? I find it hard to believe that investors just decided to trust this sketchy looking motherfucker with their money out of nowhere. Even retarded ones.
I skimmed the article looking for the explanation of how two Gringott's goblin looking walking stereotype motherfuckers were 'darlings' of the alt right, and all they have is this ONE SENTENCE:
That's all they've got, but they put it in the subheading, knowing 90% of people won't read any further.
Maybe they're just setting her up as the scapegoat.
I think that's the case. They're still trying to save Bankman.
I think he's a scapegoat. Who was enabling him? I find it hard to believe that investors just decided to trust this sketchy looking motherfucker with their money out of nowhere. Even retarded ones.
What's that guy's important name again?