I don't want kids, I can take care of my own house and I wouldn't trust them to be involved with anything I put into my body.
Throw them into Bezos' "fulfilment centers" in exchange for his support for the right. The best trade-off we'd ever get, if we could make it. They've been forcing men into shitty jobs for years, turnabout is fair play. We won't literally force them, just restrict their options the same way they did ours.
Then don't. Nobody is forcing you. If you don't want to be a responsible member of society you can stay a bachelor and live a life of solitude, and nobody will be leeching off of you. The more extreme voices here that call for laws punishing single people have no more chance of making that happen than you have enacting your Nuremburg trials for feminism plan.
Once upon a time home-making was considered a vital and respectable role. Somewhere along the way we all got a concussion and started to see it as bottom bitch chore.
Women are pale imitations of men. They are less capable than men in almost every regard, and thus they truly serve one, and only one purpose: Creating more men.
That is the only value of a woman over a man - the woman creates new men.
Men are important, we need more of them, and thus women are a valuable resource.
A resource that is simultaneously a parasite, and preventing them from being parasites has been shown to be a deleterious mishandling of that resource. The birth rate is paramount. Nothing else matters. It is, after all, the very key to our continued existence.
And what's the alternative? They leech off us forever, as the parasite class of society?
Maybe have them, you know, take care of kids at home. Take care of the house. Get them to do some smaller jobs like making clothes or gardening.
I don't want kids, I can take care of my own house and I wouldn't trust them to be involved with anything I put into my body.
Throw them into Bezos' "fulfilment centers" in exchange for his support for the right. The best trade-off we'd ever get, if we could make it. They've been forcing men into shitty jobs for years, turnabout is fair play. We won't literally force them, just restrict their options the same way they did ours.
Can. Not do. Can.
Yes, can is the right word there. Nobody asked if I do.
Then don't. Nobody is forcing you. If you don't want to be a responsible member of society you can stay a bachelor and live a life of solitude, and nobody will be leeching off of you. The more extreme voices here that call for laws punishing single people have no more chance of making that happen than you have enacting your Nuremburg trials for feminism plan.
You're forgetting that while my extreme voice challenges the ruling class, theirs plays into what the ruling class will want.
The UK already is considering bachelor taxes, and pay-offs for getting married and having kids.
Hungary already has a huge system built around taking money from single men to give it to married women.
Once upon a time home-making was considered a vital and respectable role. Somewhere along the way we all got a concussion and started to see it as bottom bitch chore.
That's because machines do it better, quicker and cheaper.
Women are pale imitations of men. They are less capable than men in almost every regard, and thus they truly serve one, and only one purpose: Creating more men.
That is the only value of a woman over a man - the woman creates new men.
Men are important, we need more of them, and thus women are a valuable resource.
A resource that is simultaneously a parasite, and preventing them from being parasites has been shown to be a deleterious mishandling of that resource. The birth rate is paramount. Nothing else matters. It is, after all, the very key to our continued existence.
The alternative, and god willing, we soon get there, is artificial wombs. Hopefully, an all-male generation is technologically possible one day.
no. it was supposed to be a partnership. men work stressful, dangerous, crappy jobs. women give sex, babies and cook food.
but.. that dynamic is skewed.