It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.
Political leaders are generally bad. You don't get to the top through moral excellence, or any sort of excellence except manipulation.
Hereditary monarchy is quite bad, and I don't support reintroducing it, but at least it is a way to ensure that only some of the people who come to power are bad, rather than close to 100%.
It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.
Political leaders are generally bad. You don't get to the top through moral excellence, or any sort of excellence except manipulation.
Hereditary monarchy is quite bad, and I don't support reintroducing it, but at least it is a way to ensure that only some of the people who come to power are bad, rather than close to 100%.