Let's not pretend that anything this joker says or does is 'news'. All he does is engage in publicity stunts. NATO knows full well that by accepting Ukraine, it would be nuked into smithereens, which would mean that the corrupt political leaders would have no one left to exploit. A nightmare scenario.
NATO can't accept an applicant country that is at war or has any unresolved border disputes, so this is nothing but a pointless gesture to make clueless retards either clap like seals or seethe.
NATO 'can' do anything it wants, of course, because there's no judicial body to invalidate it if they do admit a member with unresolved border disputes. That said, they are smart enough (and 'not crazy' enough) to abide by that.
That is assuming Biden's handlers don't want the war. That assumption is invalid. Every time there is massive inflation, the powers that be drag the US into a war to hide it.
NATO can't accept an applicant country that is at war or has any unresolved border disputes
NATO can accept any country as long as it has consent of the current members. There are no rules or criteria other than that. As long as all the countries agree, anyone can join at any time:
This is a common misconception that has its roots in the 1995 Study on NATO Enlargement carried out by the Alliance. A closer reading of this document shows that a territorial dispute does not necessarily prevent a country from joining the Alliance. Here is what the study says on the matter:
“States which have ethnic disputes or external territorial disputes, including irredentist claims, or internal jurisdictional disputes must settle those disputes by peaceful means in accordance with OSCE principles. Resolution of such disputes would be a factor in determining whether to invite a state to join the Alliance.” NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), “Study on NATO Enlargement,” last updated November 5, 2008
NATO knows full well that by accepting Ukraine, it would be nuked into smithereens
No it does not, because that would not happen, but it sounds like something a North Korean official would tweet out. Gotta earn your rubles today I guess lol.
I'm not the crazy one having wild fantasies of a nuclear holocaust over russia getting bitch-slapped around in Ukraine just like it got bitch slapped out of Afghanistan in the 80s.
You mean when it withdrew in quite an orderly manner and the government it installed lasted for another 3 years, whereas your clown country hadn't even left when the government it had installed collapsed like a house of cards, you left your own subjects behind, your marines were blown up, and you avenged them by blowing up the kids of one of your allies?
This is not even taking into account that they stayed 10 years, you stayed 20 years. Their enemies had the support of a major world power , yours did not (Or do you also buy into wild CIA conspiracy theories about Russian bounties?)
...i wonder if that same exact reasoning will be used as an excuse to bolser nato's "self defense" ablitys perhaps with nukes being on the table with M.A.D being used as the reasoning.
Let's not pretend that anything this joker says or does is 'news'. All he does is engage in publicity stunts. NATO knows full well that by accepting Ukraine, it would be nuked into smithereens, which would mean that the corrupt political leaders would have no one left to exploit. A nightmare scenario.
NATO can't accept an applicant country that is at war or has any unresolved border disputes, so this is nothing but a pointless gesture to make clueless retards either clap like seals or seethe.
And Switzerland was famously neutral until it wasn’t.
There are no rules.
NATO 'can' do anything it wants, of course, because there's no judicial body to invalidate it if they do admit a member with unresolved border disputes. That said, they are smart enough (and 'not crazy' enough) to abide by that.
That is assuming Biden's handlers don't want the war. That assumption is invalid. Every time there is massive inflation, the powers that be drag the US into a war to hide it.
NATO can accept any country as long as it has consent of the current members. There are no rules or criteria other than that. As long as all the countries agree, anyone can join at any time:
No it does not, because that would not happen, but it sounds like something a North Korean official would tweet out. Gotta earn your rubles today I guess lol.
Man, contrary to your protestations, you must be really panicking about Russian mobilization if you're going full-blown crazy this often.
I'm not the crazy one having wild fantasies of a nuclear holocaust over russia getting bitch-slapped around in Ukraine just like it got bitch slapped out of Afghanistan in the 80s.
You mean when it withdrew in quite an orderly manner and the government it installed lasted for another 3 years, whereas your clown country hadn't even left when the government it had installed collapsed like a house of cards, you left your own subjects behind, your marines were blown up, and you avenged them by blowing up the kids of one of your allies?
This is not even taking into account that they stayed 10 years, you stayed 20 years. Their enemies had the support of a major world power , yours did not (Or do you also buy into wild CIA conspiracy theories about Russian bounties?)
Objectively, the Russians did a better job.
...i wonder if that same exact reasoning will be used as an excuse to bolser nato's "self defense" ablitys perhaps with nukes being on the table with M.A.D being used as the reasoning.