Exactly. A lot more went on during the 2020 election than just fraudulent ballots.
Many states and jurisdictions implemented last minute changes to voting rules, extending ballot deadlines, removing signature requirements, allowing mail-in voting, ballot boxes, etc. many of which were implemented ILLEGALLY via executive decree, circumventing the legislative process and violating the Constitution.
Ignoring everything else, this alone is grounds for questioning the legitimacy of the election. Focusing on voter fraud, which is probably the most difficult to prove, is probably a tactical error.
Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.
Exactly. A lot more went on during the 2020 election than just fraudulent ballots.
Many states and jurisdictions implemented last minute changes to voting rules, extending ballot deadlines, removing signature requirements, allowing mail-in voting, ballot boxes, etc. many of which were implemented ILLEGALLY via executive decree, circumventing the legislative process and violating the Constitution.
Ignoring everything else, this alone is grounds for questioning the legitimacy of the election. Focusing on voter fraud, which is probably the most difficult to prove, is probably a tactical error.
Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.