Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.
Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.