Exactly. A lot more went on during the 2020 election than just fraudulent ballots.
Many states and jurisdictions implemented last minute changes to voting rules, extending ballot deadlines, removing signature requirements, allowing mail-in voting, ballot boxes, etc. many of which were implemented ILLEGALLY via executive decree, circumventing the legislative process and violating the Constitution.
Ignoring everything else, this alone is grounds for questioning the legitimacy of the election. Focusing on voter fraud, which is probably the most difficult to prove, is probably a tactical error.
Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.
Look, I'm not saying that we need to be obsessed about it, but we should absolutely not stop looking into what specific tactics were used to commit voter fraud, so that we can develop good counter-measures, otherwise the Left will just keep doing the same shit.
This is why policies like:
Mail-in voting bans
Signature confirmations
Prosecution of ballot harvesters
Voter roll clearing
Automatic audit triggers
Having smaller counties finish counting but delay reporting final totals
All need to be taken.
I'm not saying we shouldn't focus on unconstitutional policies, but for the most part that's a moot fucking point. Almost every single unconstitutional policy was based on "but muh covid", which is not going to be able to be replicated in the same way. Yes, rescind the unconstitutional edicts, but you still have to fix the specific policies and clear out the board of elections in several states.
Also, we need some State Attorney Generals with some big dick energy.
To be honest, there's been little evidence that the machines are the problem. Even in the Maricopa County audit, the Dominion voting machines behaved pretty normally. It's just that the BoE purged all their files, and back-ups, and redundant back-ups, and misused the machines themselves, and declared that by touching them the machines would need to be fully replaced for a bajillion dollars.
It doesn't really matter that the machines work when the people counting the ballots are putting the same ballot it a dozen times. Or that they intentionally break the configuration settings of the ballot reader. Or print the ballots on unacceptable paper and then hand voters bleed-through markers to invalidate the ballots. Or accept mail-in ballots that have no creases, even though the ballots are 3x the size of the envelope.
You don't need machine fraud when the operators are fraudsters in the first place.
Don't get me wrong: the machines are vulnerable and the guy in charge of Dominion is 150% TDS, but the facts show that the machines aren't really the biggest threat.
Exactly. A lot more went on during the 2020 election than just fraudulent ballots.
Many states and jurisdictions implemented last minute changes to voting rules, extending ballot deadlines, removing signature requirements, allowing mail-in voting, ballot boxes, etc. many of which were implemented ILLEGALLY via executive decree, circumventing the legislative process and violating the Constitution.
Ignoring everything else, this alone is grounds for questioning the legitimacy of the election. Focusing on voter fraud, which is probably the most difficult to prove, is probably a tactical error.
Who is even making this error? From the beginning, the center mass of objections never hanged its hat on "fraud." It was the media who from before the first objection was said, pre-emptively said "no evidence of widespread voter fraud." They did this on purpose, to poison the well. They made it sound like this was the only objection, and that it had been debooooonked.
But this isn't the fault of those who objected. The reasonable objections were never given a seat at the table. It's the same stratagem used with the "insurrection" horseshit. A handful of yahoos fight with feds in a place, then far down the block, some yahoos are waved in by smiling security. The media takes a little from buffet bin A and buffet bin B to make them sound like the same people, some kind of unified force of aggression, violence, revolution.
But this isn't the fault of the flies caught in the web, and it's silly to blame them. None of the dupes had a birds-eye view.
Look, I'm not saying that we need to be obsessed about it, but we should absolutely not stop looking into what specific tactics were used to commit voter fraud, so that we can develop good counter-measures, otherwise the Left will just keep doing the same shit.
This is why policies like:
All need to be taken.
I'm not saying we shouldn't focus on unconstitutional policies, but for the most part that's a moot fucking point. Almost every single unconstitutional policy was based on "but muh covid", which is not going to be able to be replicated in the same way. Yes, rescind the unconstitutional edicts, but you still have to fix the specific policies and clear out the board of elections in several states.
Also, we need some State Attorney Generals with some big dick energy.
What about black box voting/counting machines?
To be honest, there's been little evidence that the machines are the problem. Even in the Maricopa County audit, the Dominion voting machines behaved pretty normally. It's just that the BoE purged all their files, and back-ups, and redundant back-ups, and misused the machines themselves, and declared that by touching them the machines would need to be fully replaced for a bajillion dollars.
It doesn't really matter that the machines work when the people counting the ballots are putting the same ballot it a dozen times. Or that they intentionally break the configuration settings of the ballot reader. Or print the ballots on unacceptable paper and then hand voters bleed-through markers to invalidate the ballots. Or accept mail-in ballots that have no creases, even though the ballots are 3x the size of the envelope.
You don't need machine fraud when the operators are fraudsters in the first place.
Don't get me wrong: the machines are vulnerable and the guy in charge of Dominion is 150% TDS, but the facts show that the machines aren't really the biggest threat.