I believe technically he was suspended with pay pending a disciplinary hearing.
The based teacher's argument for why he continued to show up is also fairly convoluted, arguing his love for teaching, a duty to continue as a Christian and the lack of a "gross misconduct" allegation allowing him to be put on leave.
I think part of his argument is that agreeing to stay home on suspension in itself is a personal admission he did something wrong enough to warrant it.
I think part of his argument is that agreeing to stay home on suspension in itself is a personal admission he did something wrong enough to warrant it.
That's not a sound argument, in my opinion. Showing up repeatedly sounds unnecessarily confrontational.
I believe technically he was suspended with pay pending a disciplinary hearing.
The based teacher's argument for why he continued to show up is also fairly convoluted, arguing his love for teaching, a duty to continue as a Christian and the lack of a "gross misconduct" allegation allowing him to be put on leave.
I think part of his argument is that agreeing to stay home on suspension in itself is a personal admission he did something wrong enough to warrant it.
That's not a sound argument, in my opinion. Showing up repeatedly sounds unnecessarily confrontational.
Good. The pronoun folx are cowards and confrontation is the only thing that works on them since they don't acknowledge logic or morality.
This did nothing but get him in trouble.