This Is A Violation Of Rule 2 According To Our Faggot Mod
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
It’s not violence if it’s legal somewhere! Can you tell me how this sub is “endangered”. Whose the big scary you fear faggot. This isn’t Reddit.
This is so tediously stupid. I compared the FBI to redcoats and that is agitating violence? The FBI’s own actions agitated violence. That somehow makes it my fault for calling it out?
How would you rewrite rule 2 to make its application more fair and protect the forum? (with the restriction that you can't just remove it)
Don’t break the law. Pretty fucking simple.
That's already rule one. Don't you think there needs to be something specifically for glowposts that are trying to egg people on, which could be used as evidence that this place is fomenting violent revolution or mass shootings? Such speech may not be illegal, but may get us shut down.
I am not agreeing that your banned post was a violation of rule 2 either, but I get his reasoning.
Get us shut down by who? Notice how your first reaction is to counter free speech with censorship not free speech. This cowardice is why kia1 and 2 split. Now you advocate for us to self censor to appease others. I reject that philosophy as this is the actual “glowposting”. You cannot say you value truth if you are willing to censor it out of fear. This is a subjugation mentality, and I will not be your slave.
There's also some stuff that does not violate 'the law' but still attracts negative attention from law enforcement and others.
So we should cower in fear? Lol
It's hosted in the US, so it's American laws that matter.
Besides, I'm not calling for violation of abortion laws. I'm saying that it should be legal. You're also free to call for revolution to be made legal, while not calling for illegal revolutionary actions.
We still have registrars and hosters. Did you completely miss that ConsumeProduct was taken down? What do you think will happen if you call for violence and mayhem, as you do, besides getting the attention of the feds?
Sounded like that to me, but I'll take your word for it if you say it wasn't.
Since most people believe that "violence against redcoats" was justified, I think the reasonable reading of your post is that it's also justified against the FBI.
Whether or not it is, it's counterproductive at the moment, and calling for it most certainly is counterproductive.
You mean the reason we have the 4 amendment? Which anyone with a small knowledge of American history would know. Btw the same advocator of “violence” John Adams defended the redcoats in court.
What’s counter productive is pretending forced self censorship is the solution
Yes, and during your little 'Revolution'?
You want to be able to freely incite violence? Then you should go away from here.
keep getting ratioed faggot, no one is buying your bullshit