5 () posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +5 / -0 53 comments share 53 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Puberty blockers and hormone treatments were never unleashed on boys?
maybe not never, but the problem is 100x more prevalent with young girls.
anyway I'm not seeing any evidence of anything from that screenshot.
It's certainly several times worse in girls (which is why the Imp is supporting it).
But my point was not that. It's that if they ban hormone treatment and puberty blockers (= chemical castration), that protects boys as well as girls.
Yes I see no reason to believe that these protections are limited to girls.
That's not what it says, but words never stopped you - champion of just making stuff up.
The worst thing about you is not even your seething hatreds.
It's the fact that you draw enormous conclusions based on little to non-existent evidence.
Like the fact that you took the Democrats supporting the draft for women as proof that "THEY ARE TURNING ON THE WOMANS!"