5 () posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +5 / -0 53 comments share 53 comments share save hide report block hide replies
It's certainly several times worse in girls (which is why the Imp is supporting it).
But my point was not that. It's that if they ban hormone treatment and puberty blockers (= chemical castration), that protects boys as well as girls.
Yes I see no reason to believe that these protections are limited to girls.