It isn't that the Left, or indeed "everyone", projects. It's that everyone has lenses and biases with which they view the world.
I see some saucy Misty art (or whatever underage v& is popular these days) and shrug. Fictional. The only real tragedy is that The Pokemon Company isn't being paid for such mass use of their intellectual property.
Someone else sees it, and says "this image makes people want to harm real-world children". Well, the only people that they could know the thoughts of is themself. It's certainly not supported by data, which actually shows the opposite fun fact, it's a purely emotional argument, with emotions generating from within the self.
Always watch for people who define a horrible negative trait, and then include themselves (overtly or subtly) in the overarching category they're describing.
The opposite political side showcase of this is the gay pastors. The ones going "God says gays gonna go to hell, take it up with Him, I don't make the laws." appeal to authority or data, not emotion or self. Meanwhile, the ones going "those gays seduce good men away from the righteous path with their sexual ways, did I mention that pastors are good men on righteous paths?"... Probably gonna be found in a gay bar at some point, arguing from an emotive and personal lens stance.
That the biggest voices in shutting down art they don't like "to protect the children" are the same biggest voices advocating for "drag queen show you dick to kids dance hour" tells me everything about the righteousness of their cause.
They're just moving this crap around. They reduce the number of older men trying to sleep with underage girls, and replace it with older trying to convince underage kids to amputate their genitals.
It's like a power vacuum or something, you get rid of one group and a new even worse moves into their previous spot.
The hypersensitivity towards racism made me unironically racist. Once I saw them screeching about situations that were not racist, I became aware of how massively coddled minorities were and the massive effort to suppress information about their bad habits. Even the show COPS purposefully selected videos to show white criminals far more often than their representation in crime.
It isn't that the Left, or indeed "everyone", projects.
...
Someone else sees it, and says "this image makes people want to harm real-world children". Well, the only people that they could know the thoughts of is themself.
Except people who engage in deviant sexual behavior are highly likely to commit sex crimes. This isn't some secret and is such a strange fucking Hill to die on. It's not just people saying don't censor it you're actively opposed to criticism of loli and the obviously pedophilic dudes into it
Purely emotional arguments could also come from having kids. I don't have any children so this is all academic for me. If I did then my risk calculation might change. Not saying I'd be correct, but my personal lens would be shaped by the very natural and important instinct to protect children.
It isn't that the Left, or indeed "everyone", projects. It's that everyone has lenses and biases with which they view the world.
I see some saucy Misty art (or whatever underage v& is popular these days) and shrug. Fictional. The only real tragedy is that The Pokemon Company isn't being paid for such mass use of their intellectual property.
Someone else sees it, and says "this image makes people want to harm real-world children". Well, the only people that they could know the thoughts of is themself. It's certainly not supported by data, which actually shows the opposite fun fact, it's a purely emotional argument, with emotions generating from within the self.
Always watch for people who define a horrible negative trait, and then include themselves (overtly or subtly) in the overarching category they're describing.
The opposite political side showcase of this is the gay pastors. The ones going "God says gays gonna go to hell, take it up with Him, I don't make the laws." appeal to authority or data, not emotion or self. Meanwhile, the ones going "those gays seduce good men away from the righteous path with their sexual ways, did I mention that pastors are good men on righteous paths?"... Probably gonna be found in a gay bar at some point, arguing from an emotive and personal lens stance.
That the biggest voices in shutting down art they don't like "to protect the children" are the same biggest voices advocating for "drag queen show you dick to kids dance hour" tells me everything about the righteousness of their cause.
Lol bullshit
Found the nonce.
Yeah, I don't see drag queens (or reddit mods) trying to get any porn banned. It's good for you, don'tcha know?
They're just moving this crap around. They reduce the number of older men trying to sleep with underage girls, and replace it with older trying to convince underage kids to amputate their genitals.
It's like a power vacuum or something, you get rid of one group and a new even worse moves into their previous spot.
They see racism everywhere for the same reason.
The hypersensitivity towards racism made me unironically racist. Once I saw them screeching about situations that were not racist, I became aware of how massively coddled minorities were and the massive effort to suppress information about their bad habits. Even the show COPS purposefully selected videos to show white criminals far more often than their representation in crime.
...
That's literally what projecting is.
Except people who engage in deviant sexual behavior are highly likely to commit sex crimes. This isn't some secret and is such a strange fucking Hill to die on. It's not just people saying don't censor it you're actively opposed to criticism of loli and the obviously pedophilic dudes into it
But muh datas :(
Purely emotional arguments could also come from having kids. I don't have any children so this is all academic for me. If I did then my risk calculation might change. Not saying I'd be correct, but my personal lens would be shaped by the very natural and important instinct to protect children.