Conquered people rarely have a say in what happens to themselves afterwards.
Throughout most of human history, conquered people were treated much more harshly than they were by the Christian nations that conquered much of the world. In fact, those very same conquered people would never have been so kind to Christian nations if the situations were reversed.
Sorry, not sorry that my ancestors were so much better at it than you. You lost, get over it.
None. It was the actions of a multitude of humans, not gods, mainly white British ones, that led to any level of weakening of the practice of slavery directly, combined with advances in technology that made using slaves a financially inferior model for anything except sexual services (and the only reason that one isn't being undermined by superior technology is puritanism keeping product development slower).
Your grandstanding would make more sense in a Christian vs Paganistic or Islamic debate, since the one allows for the concept of no slaves versus the other two which have it entwined within their cultural cores.
conquered people were treated much more harshly than they were by the Christian nations that conquered much of the world
For a truly fair comparison we should check what happened with the descendants of slaves that were sent/sold Eastwards while the others went West to the Americas. You know, the ones who were gelded so they couldn't reprodu- oh.
Conquered people rarely have a say in what happens to themselves afterwards.
Throughout most of human history, conquered people were treated much more harshly than they were by the Christian nations that conquered much of the world. In fact, those very same conquered people would never have been so kind to Christian nations if the situations were reversed.
Sorry, not sorry that my ancestors were so much better at it than you. You lost, get over it.
They'll have a better chance of not getting conquered next time if they invent useful things like the wheel and a written language.
i'm actually sorry they were, because now i have to deal with it.
Let’s debunk “modern” atheism in 4 words. What religion ended slavery
None. It was the actions of a multitude of humans, not gods, mainly white British ones, that led to any level of weakening of the practice of slavery directly, combined with advances in technology that made using slaves a financially inferior model for anything except sexual services (and the only reason that one isn't being undermined by superior technology is puritanism keeping product development slower).
Your grandstanding would make more sense in a Christian vs Paganistic or Islamic debate, since the one allows for the concept of no slaves versus the other two which have it entwined within their cultural cores.
Shut up IGN.
For a truly fair comparison we should check what happened with the descendants of slaves that were sent/sold Eastwards while the others went West to the Americas. You know, the ones who were gelded so they couldn't reprodu- oh.