... is anyone uncomfortable about how The Hill is uncomfortably legitimizing the idea of Covid Vaccine skepticism?
I mean, I'm okay with information getting out to normies, but I'm very concerned that such an establishment source is prepared to make such statements. Who's allowing this information out and why?
Normally, comments like this get your bank account closed, and your career ended, so who's protecting her?
Because they have to get ahead of all the people dying from the shots, and still getting seriously ill.
The shitlib globalists (as always) didn't understand the people that vote for them run on feelings so much that facts don't matter, even when it comes from them.
The tinfoil theory is that the plan was always to make national governments look like the bad guys, then a formal global government could be established to thunderous applause.
Ehhhh. That's feels like something more long-term or niche. The US is already well involved in the global government. If this were Austria, Portugal, or Switzerland, yeah that would make more sense. But there's way to many globalist allies in the US government.
Normally their rhetoric is about how "the US must take a role of leadership on the world stage" when they really mean: "succumb to globalist agendas".
I'm okay with information getting out to normies, but I'm very concerned that such an establishment source is prepared to make such statements.
Even Ontario Health issued a statement that the vaccine has a risk of myocarditis in young men and that in those age brackets, a risk evaluation is required by the person in order to weight the pros and cons of vaccination.
Total jaw drop moment. No one questioned the sudden change from Vaccine passports to "Hey guys, think long and hard if this is right for you".
Not American so I'm not that familiar with this outlet. I do remember the same woman on the same show was on point early on in the development of Omicron, giving a breakdown of the two flights that were diverted when flying out of Johannesberg. When those passengers were covid tested, a small amount were found to have Omicron, but the kicker was that 10% of passengers, 60-something out of 600, were found to have other earlier strains.
In other words, fully vaccinated people had already been spreading covid all over the world mostly asymptomatically, usually untested, and clearly doing so before Omicron. This wouldn't even be a surprise to anyone who had been looking at the infection and hospitalisation stats during Delta. The Hill were happy to report this damning evidence.
Many facts which should be completely fatal to the pro-vaxx narrative are completely out in the open and have been for a long time. Obviously there are venues such as Twitter and YT etc. where all discussion is tightly controlled. But the pedo enablers who run those platforms don't actually run the entire world. I'm rather disinclined to perceive this as a crafted dripfeed of damage control or expectation management, and more inclined to see it as a reflection that the remainder of the press and the viewing public are 1) completely stupid, in that they can't figure out the implications of damning facts that have been easily accessible for a long time, and 2) completely dickless, in that they simply choose not to repeat any of these facts when they encounter them.
Most of the information control is not outwardly imposed, it has instead been a massive collective failing in the pattern recognition capability of the human race, and a failure to use the brains and balls we're endowed with. Admittedly, it's happened in the wake of the biggest global propaganda campaign since WW2. Still, I don't think people should be so easily forgiven for their willingness to follow. I also don't think those who have simply gone on presenting their info and common sense conclusions as normal should be rewarded with suspicion - even if they are potentially untrustworthy news outlets - because they are not attempting to be all that heroic or miraculous. The pro-vaxx narrative just really is that unsalvageable. It's better to recalibrate and view these rare truth-tellers as the standard, too often unmet, and the persistent propagandists as extreme hostile elements actively trying to kill you.
I was under the impression that CRISPR was in the vaccine and was altering mRNA in your body as it was, to produce the Spike Protein, not that it was changing your DNA.
... is anyone uncomfortable about how The Hill is uncomfortably legitimizing the idea of Covid Vaccine skepticism?
I mean, I'm okay with information getting out to normies, but I'm very concerned that such an establishment source is prepared to make such statements. Who's allowing this information out and why?
Normally, comments like this get your bank account closed, and your career ended, so who's protecting her?
Because they have to get ahead of all the people dying from the shots, and still getting seriously ill.
The shitlib globalists (as always) didn't understand the people that vote for them run on feelings so much that facts don't matter, even when it comes from them.
The tinfoil theory is that the plan was always to make national governments look like the bad guys, then a formal global government could be established to thunderous applause.
Ehhhh. That's feels like something more long-term or niche. The US is already well involved in the global government. If this were Austria, Portugal, or Switzerland, yeah that would make more sense. But there's way to many globalist allies in the US government.
Normally their rhetoric is about how "the US must take a role of leadership on the world stage" when they really mean: "succumb to globalist agendas".
also remember both sides are controlled. pro and anti vaccines. Why? to waste our time, keep us busy.
Even Ontario Health issued a statement that the vaccine has a risk of myocarditis in young men and that in those age brackets, a risk evaluation is required by the person in order to weight the pros and cons of vaccination.
Total jaw drop moment. No one questioned the sudden change from Vaccine passports to "Hey guys, think long and hard if this is right for you".
Not American so I'm not that familiar with this outlet. I do remember the same woman on the same show was on point early on in the development of Omicron, giving a breakdown of the two flights that were diverted when flying out of Johannesberg. When those passengers were covid tested, a small amount were found to have Omicron, but the kicker was that 10% of passengers, 60-something out of 600, were found to have other earlier strains.
In other words, fully vaccinated people had already been spreading covid all over the world mostly asymptomatically, usually untested, and clearly doing so before Omicron. This wouldn't even be a surprise to anyone who had been looking at the infection and hospitalisation stats during Delta. The Hill were happy to report this damning evidence.
Many facts which should be completely fatal to the pro-vaxx narrative are completely out in the open and have been for a long time. Obviously there are venues such as Twitter and YT etc. where all discussion is tightly controlled. But the pedo enablers who run those platforms don't actually run the entire world. I'm rather disinclined to perceive this as a crafted dripfeed of damage control or expectation management, and more inclined to see it as a reflection that the remainder of the press and the viewing public are 1) completely stupid, in that they can't figure out the implications of damning facts that have been easily accessible for a long time, and 2) completely dickless, in that they simply choose not to repeat any of these facts when they encounter them.
Most of the information control is not outwardly imposed, it has instead been a massive collective failing in the pattern recognition capability of the human race, and a failure to use the brains and balls we're endowed with. Admittedly, it's happened in the wake of the biggest global propaganda campaign since WW2. Still, I don't think people should be so easily forgiven for their willingness to follow. I also don't think those who have simply gone on presenting their info and common sense conclusions as normal should be rewarded with suspicion - even if they are potentially untrustworthy news outlets - because they are not attempting to be all that heroic or miraculous. The pro-vaxx narrative just really is that unsalvageable. It's better to recalibrate and view these rare truth-tellers as the standard, too often unmet, and the persistent propagandists as extreme hostile elements actively trying to kill you.
I was under the impression that CRISPR was in the vaccine and was altering mRNA in your body as it was, to produce the Spike Protein, not that it was changing your DNA.
transcription and translation, in Europe we teach them in 8th grade biology and then again in high school biology.
dna is made of rna. if you alter rna, you also alter dna.
I don't think that's right.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/worst-fears-realized-pfizer-mrna