But when you legalize weed and remove the taboo, those same rebellious teenagers won't stop being rebellious, they'll just replace weed with something way more dangerous, like meth.
Is this actually true? That would suggest that weed use would decline where it is regulated. And I think the meth problem came up long before weed was legalized.
Bear in mind that I in no way favor the legalization of weed.
Now it's not taboo at all, it's even promoted, just like weed, and instead of just fucking in private they do it in the streets, and instead of fucking one dude they fuck dozens at a time.
I think the problem is not as much what 'people' do, and what the left starts pushing. As long as the left has a legitimate cause to push, it'll do that. When it's fresh out of legitimate causes, it starts pushing something illegitimate to downright evil. It is always pushing the envelope.
So imagining for a moment that complete equality between homosexuals and normal people is desirable: the legitimate cause would be same-sex marriage. But when that happened, it became Drag Queen story hour, castrating your kids, and all sorts of other nonsense.
Same for blacks. It's unquestionably correct to not have people be disadvantaged based on their color and race. But when that happened, they started advocating for riots, special preferences, busing, and God knows what.
It seems that even in cases where we think the left is correct, we should stop just short of 'remedying' the situation completely, to make the leftists stuck on the thing that is actually just - rather than moving on to the truly heinous stuff.
Is this actually true? That would suggest that weed use would decline where it is regulated. And I think the meth problem came up long before weed was legalized.
Bear in mind that I in no way favor the legalization of weed.
Well, the point is really the taboo. It hasn't been taboo in western mainstream for decades.
I think the problem is not as much what 'people' do, and what the left starts pushing. As long as the left has a legitimate cause to push, it'll do that. When it's fresh out of legitimate causes, it starts pushing something illegitimate to downright evil. It is always pushing the envelope.
So imagining for a moment that complete equality between homosexuals and normal people is desirable: the legitimate cause would be same-sex marriage. But when that happened, it became Drag Queen story hour, castrating your kids, and all sorts of other nonsense.
Same for blacks. It's unquestionably correct to not have people be disadvantaged based on their color and race. But when that happened, they started advocating for riots, special preferences, busing, and God knows what.
It seems that even in cases where we think the left is correct, we should stop just short of 'remedying' the situation completely, to make the leftists stuck on the thing that is actually just - rather than moving on to the truly heinous stuff.
Yeah, that's why this shit needs to be nipped in the bud. Every time they were given a mile they took the entire planet, so it's time to go back.
Well, the point is really the taboo. It hasn't been taboo in western mainstream for decades.
That suggests that it being a crime wasn't doing much.
Every time they were given a mile they took the entire planet, so it's time to go back.
Since there is no logic nor limiting principle, they'll eventually just spin out of control with their quest for novelty, destroying themselves and possibly their country in the process.
Bear in mind that the original gay rights movement openly included pedo shit. See Harry Hay. They only dropped that stuff later on. As I've said before, I think AIDS forced them to drop the pedo shit because they needed help from the normies to deal with it.
Actually, I believe they were pushing pedophilia long after AIDS. In the 1990s, there was a homosexual organization called ILGA, which was a federation of different organizations, and they included... pro-pedophilia organizations.
I'm sure they pushed it still. They push it now, but they used to not care as much about PR nightmares. I'm just speculating that AIDS forced them to care more, though. It could have also just been impatience with their lack of achievements.
Is this actually true? That would suggest that weed use would decline where it is regulated. And I think the meth problem came up long before weed was legalized.
Bear in mind that I in no way favor the legalization of weed.
I think the problem is not as much what 'people' do, and what the left starts pushing. As long as the left has a legitimate cause to push, it'll do that. When it's fresh out of legitimate causes, it starts pushing something illegitimate to downright evil. It is always pushing the envelope.
So imagining for a moment that complete equality between homosexuals and normal people is desirable: the legitimate cause would be same-sex marriage. But when that happened, it became Drag Queen story hour, castrating your kids, and all sorts of other nonsense.
Same for blacks. It's unquestionably correct to not have people be disadvantaged based on their color and race. But when that happened, they started advocating for riots, special preferences, busing, and God knows what.
It seems that even in cases where we think the left is correct, we should stop just short of 'remedying' the situation completely, to make the leftists stuck on the thing that is actually just - rather than moving on to the truly heinous stuff.
Well, the point is really the taboo. It hasn't been taboo in western mainstream for decades.
Yeah, that's why this shit needs to be nipped in the bud. Every time they were given a mile they took the entire planet, so it's time to go back.
That suggests that it being a crime wasn't doing much.
Since there is no logic nor limiting principle, they'll eventually just spin out of control with their quest for novelty, destroying themselves and possibly their country in the process.
Pot is not harmless especially to teenagers. Smoking is bad for your lungs weed is bad for under developed brains. It's also bad for motivation
Bear in mind that the original gay rights movement openly included pedo shit. See Harry Hay. They only dropped that stuff later on. As I've said before, I think AIDS forced them to drop the pedo shit because they needed help from the normies to deal with it.
Actually, I believe they were pushing pedophilia long after AIDS. In the 1990s, there was a homosexual organization called ILGA, which was a federation of different organizations, and they included... pro-pedophilia organizations.
Only dropped it when it became a PR nightmare.
I'm sure they pushed it still. They push it now, but they used to not care as much about PR nightmares. I'm just speculating that AIDS forced them to care more, though. It could have also just been impatience with their lack of achievements.
According to Nerdrotic he saw nambla at a LA priest parade still in the early 2000s