BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn. Still, this is rather unseemly. I don't believe for a moment that such a con of a company cares about her, or anyone.
Yes “coerced” into believing none of their families would see it. Quit defended whores for being whores. They knew exactly what they were doing they just didn’t think they’d be caught.
The legal case was over them lying to women about the film distribution. They were aussies saying they would sell to aussies. There was never any real rape accusations unless you think Alyssa Milano was raped by Harvey Weinstein. If the gdp girls were “raped” then the word truly has no definition.
Well damn I never cared to look into and porn is retardedly sketchy so I assumed it was true. If they were really contacting people pretending to not be a porn company then I care even less that they got fucked over.
BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn.
Nobody "coerced" shit. She did porn FOR MONEY. 99% of the girls who did girlsdoporn had 0 issues. The company used false advertisement to attract girls, but once the girls responded, they were told it was actually a porn solicitation and offered a lot of money. So any girls who accepted, consented, they were not "coerced".
A handful (out of many hundreds) made rape allegations. None of the filmed scenes were rapes. Instead, a few girls said they were raped off camera. I find this highly doubtful. It's far more likely that the girls simply regretted doing porn. It is well known, thanks to studies, that a few percent of girls are willing to make false rape allegations to take revenge on men who they feel have wronged them.
How do you get coerced into doing pornography for a site literally called girlsdoporn.com?
Don’t get me wrong, I would burn down the pornography industry in a day if I could, but if you don’t walk into that company expecting anything other than sexual activity being your job, then you’ve certainly hit the bottom of the barrel in deductive reasoning.
TL;DR: GDP defrauded, sexually abused performers, outright raped people, and violated multiple sex trafficking laws though their luring scheme and other actions such as blocking doors with camera boxes.
Something very fishy is going on. Here is another instance of Celsius (or Forbes, or someone) false DMCA'ing information about Jessica Khater.
https://twitter.com/cryptocoitas/status/1245161538727686144
So what was this? Nothing more than a screenshot of Forbes 30 Under 30.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220619103518/https://twitter.com/cryptocoitas/status/1245161538727686144
BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn. Still, this is rather unseemly. I don't believe for a moment that such a con of a company cares about her, or anyone.
Yes “coerced” into believing none of their families would see it. Quit defended whores for being whores. They knew exactly what they were doing they just didn’t think they’d be caught.
Islam is right about women.
Sharia law states:
A woman testifying about a sex crime requires 4 male family members to testify with her before she can be believed
Weren't the gdp dudes like straight up raping women
The legal case was over them lying to women about the film distribution. They were aussies saying they would sell to aussies. There was never any real rape accusations unless you think Alyssa Milano was raped by Harvey Weinstein. If the gdp girls were “raped” then the word truly has no definition.
Well damn I never cared to look into and porn is retardedly sketchy so I assumed it was true. If they were really contacting people pretending to not be a porn company then I care even less that they got fucked over.
Nobody "coerced" shit. She did porn FOR MONEY. 99% of the girls who did girlsdoporn had 0 issues. The company used false advertisement to attract girls, but once the girls responded, they were told it was actually a porn solicitation and offered a lot of money. So any girls who accepted, consented, they were not "coerced".
A handful (out of many hundreds) made rape allegations. None of the filmed scenes were rapes. Instead, a few girls said they were raped off camera. I find this highly doubtful. It's far more likely that the girls simply regretted doing porn. It is well known, thanks to studies, that a few percent of girls are willing to make false rape allegations to take revenge on men who they feel have wronged them.
How do you get coerced into doing pornography for a site literally called girlsdoporn.com?
Don’t get me wrong, I would burn down the pornography industry in a day if I could, but if you don’t walk into that company expecting anything other than sexual activity being your job, then you’ve certainly hit the bottom of the barrel in deductive reasoning.
Well, they don't advertise themselves as "girlsdoporn.com". The porn companies never do. It's a shady industry.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6204915/Plaintiffs-Trial-Brief-3.pdf
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/1890-criminal-complaint-sdca-sex-trafficking/3206b56cb9bb34834657/optimized/full.pdf
Found this on https://archive.ph/0q0o5
TL;DR: GDP defrauded, sexually abused performers, outright raped people, and violated multiple sex trafficking laws though their luring scheme and other actions such as blocking doors with camera boxes.
Whether the woman is one of the actual victims or some moron who erroneously did business with GDP is unknown, https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25216054
Imagine believing women after their "holding rapists accountable" movement was led by a pedophile.
Helped getting a female judge for the case, didn't it.
Fix was in.
Didn't you post an article written by an 'Oppressor' just a few days ago?
So you thought it was all lies, and you posted it anyway?
Yeah, just like with the Amber Heard case.
You can't lie about something that's literally visible.
It was a jury trial. The judge couldn't just impose her own will even if she had wanted to.