Oh no! She might have had to give up her dreams you guys! Her dreams of fucking a bunch of dudes and drinking, and working a shitty useless job as a copy editor, and traveling to Europe to fuck more dudes, there’s no way she could do all of that without abortion!
I’ve heard plenty of stories of women who regret getting abortions but I’ve never heard the opposite. Your shallow, vacuous “dreams” are nothing compared to raising a child in a loving family.
This attitude towards abortion is only possible thanks to the insane solipsism that our society has nurtured in women. All of the girl power and yas kween messaging, all of the cheap social media validation, all of the institutional support and favoritism, has convinced worker bee girls that they’re really the center of the universe. They’d rather hamster wheel rationalizations for baby murder than give up their “dreams”.
Meanwhile, in reality, plenty of women accomplish their dreams and don’t kill their kids. And the only way to guarantee that you are the center of someone’s world is to create that someone.
Meanwhile, in reality, plenty of women accomplish their dreams and don’t kill their kids.
I wouldn't normally say this to you, but... go further than that. The problem is that we've trained women and girls to think that their real dreams involve being a valuable corporate asset in a white-collar syndicate.
Meanwhile, most little girls play with dolls of babies because when they are 5 and 6, the bludgeon of socialization doesn't have as much of an effect as the biological imperative of care does. They want to raise kids even as kids, simply because of a biological imperative. Our society beats that out of them to maintain a larger pool of corporate labor to drive down wage growth. We teach girls that it's stupid and childish to want kids; followed by teaching them that it's dangerous and ruinous to have kids. Until finally in their late 30's, biological imperative rears it's ugly head and screams at them to have kids, only realizing far too late that socialization can't simply block out biological imperatives.
Women of older generations grew up helping to raise their brothers and sisters. Eventually, they would realize that they could probably do the whole thing on their own and have their own family. Women would dream of being a loving mother, of a large family, at the center of guidance and status within a social community, made up of many of her own kin, or the family of her best friends. That was the dream of women. It's a good dream that we beat out of them.
Primates instinctively pick out toys suited for their sex (aka gender - which has always been synonymous with sex despite leftist scrREEching, otherwise you wouldn't have 'IT'S A BOY'/GIRL! and gender reveals, etc.). The tested chimp females played with girls stuff like dolls and stuffies, and kitchen toys. Boys went for the "sTeReOtyPicAL" male toys.
Oh no! She might have had to give up her dreams you guys! Her dreams of fucking a bunch of dudes and drinking, and working a shitty useless job as a copy editor, and traveling to Europe to fuck more dudes, there’s no way she could do all of that without abortion!
I’ve heard plenty of stories of women who regret getting abortions but I’ve never heard the opposite. Your shallow, vacuous “dreams” are nothing compared to raising a child in a loving family.
This attitude towards abortion is only possible thanks to the insane solipsism that our society has nurtured in women. All of the girl power and yas kween messaging, all of the cheap social media validation, all of the institutional support and favoritism, has convinced worker bee girls that they’re really the center of the universe. They’d rather hamster wheel rationalizations for baby murder than give up their “dreams”.
Meanwhile, in reality, plenty of women accomplish their dreams and don’t kill their kids. And the only way to guarantee that you are the center of someone’s world is to create that someone.
I wouldn't normally say this to you, but... go further than that. The problem is that we've trained women and girls to think that their real dreams involve being a valuable corporate asset in a white-collar syndicate.
Meanwhile, most little girls play with dolls of babies because when they are 5 and 6, the bludgeon of socialization doesn't have as much of an effect as the biological imperative of care does. They want to raise kids even as kids, simply because of a biological imperative. Our society beats that out of them to maintain a larger pool of corporate labor to drive down wage growth. We teach girls that it's stupid and childish to want kids; followed by teaching them that it's dangerous and ruinous to have kids. Until finally in their late 30's, biological imperative rears it's ugly head and screams at them to have kids, only realizing far too late that socialization can't simply block out biological imperatives.
Women of older generations grew up helping to raise their brothers and sisters. Eventually, they would realize that they could probably do the whole thing on their own and have their own family. Women would dream of being a loving mother, of a large family, at the center of guidance and status within a social community, made up of many of her own kin, or the family of her best friends. That was the dream of women. It's a good dream that we beat out of them.
Primates instinctively pick out toys suited for their sex (aka gender - which has always been synonymous with sex despite leftist scrREEching, otherwise you wouldn't have 'IT'S A BOY'/GIRL! and gender reveals, etc.). The tested chimp females played with girls stuff like dolls and stuffies, and kitchen toys. Boys went for the "sTeReOtyPicAL" male toys.
Babies did the same.