It likely isn't. There's been plenty of studies on spousal abuse, and they're pretty much all in consensus that the fewer men in the relationship, the more likely it is to be abusive. M-M gay couples have the least abuse, M-F couples mid, and F-F couples have an overwhelming lead, when polled. Who am I to argue with TheScience?
Being in an abusive relationship is going to cause psychological distress. And your identity doesn't change until you act upon it, meaning they're more and more flirting with the abusive coupling category.
Well it makes sense, doesn't it? More women means less parties that understand the concepts of agency and responsibility. If no one in the relationship is to take responsibility they can only blame each other which builds up resentment which leads to abusive behaviour. Since the abusive behaviour is also 'not their fault' it remains unchecked and escalates.
It likely isn't. There's been plenty of studies on spousal abuse, and they're pretty much all in consensus that the fewer men in the relationship, the more likely it is to be abusive. M-M gay couples have the least abuse, M-F couples mid, and F-F couples have an overwhelming lead, when polled. Who am I to argue with TheScience?
Being in an abusive relationship is going to cause psychological distress. And your identity doesn't change until you act upon it, meaning they're more and more flirting with the abusive coupling category.
Well it makes sense, doesn't it? More women means less parties that understand the concepts of agency and responsibility. If no one in the relationship is to take responsibility they can only blame each other which builds up resentment which leads to abusive behaviour. Since the abusive behaviour is also 'not their fault' it remains unchecked and escalates.