The map presented at the lead of the article has nothing to do with the CSCE or the content of the article. It is deliberately misleading.
The anonymous author, pen name Niccolo Soldo, has been in the tank for Russia hard ever since the war began, and pushes a very Russia-centric point of view that comes across as laughably delusional to an American like me. I mean, I just can't accept any of this bullshit as anything other than "we want to make up some bullshit to rationalize how our invasion and conquest of countries that don't want to be dominated by us is actually just us defending ourselves against some bullshit we aren't just totally making up as an excuse to do what we want". I can't take anyone like that seriously.
Something from one of his articles:
Ukrainian President Shecky Greenberg is fucked beyond belief.
That looks antisemitic
Anyway this is just par for the course with anti-Americans these days. They latch on to, fall in love with, and shill for anyone who seems like he can pose a threat to the "American world order", which of course is a joke, since Putin comes nowhere near that power level. China will in the future if they don't tank their economy in the next 5 years or so (or we don't tank it for them, which we should), but the CCP is so much worse than the US on every metric that anyone willing to side with the CCP over the US is just evil.
You may think it's misleading, but I think it's relevant. It's absolutely related to the content of the article. He does say on the caption that the image is a work of fiction made by a fan of such dissolutions, not that it was part of that specific paper. Following the image link, it was used on the Ukrainian version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_Russia which presents many hypothetical situations where Russia could be broken up. The paper is one such hypothetical situation.
Yes it's obvious that the writer is biased on the side of Russia. I don't really care.
from one of his articles...That looks antisemitic
So what? He's on Russia's side in the war, and Putin is at least pretending to be doing this to defend Jews.
Nothing in the article calls for the breakup of Russia in any way. That meaning to "decolonializing" is a leap being taken by this tool without evidence.
Nearly all of Russia is full of ethnic Russians except for a few notable areas like Chechnya.
All of the Caucasus except the Krais has very few Russians. It may not be the near 100% of Chechnya but all the ethnic republics are overwhelmingly native. They've "even" left Abkhazia, ironically.
The map presented at the lead of the article has nothing to do with the CSCE or the content of the article. It is deliberately misleading.
The anonymous author, pen name Niccolo Soldo, has been in the tank for Russia hard ever since the war began, and pushes a very Russia-centric point of view that comes across as laughably delusional to an American like me. I mean, I just can't accept any of this bullshit as anything other than "we want to make up some bullshit to rationalize how our invasion and conquest of countries that don't want to be dominated by us is actually just us defending ourselves against some bullshit we aren't just totally making up as an excuse to do what we want". I can't take anyone like that seriously.
Something from one of his articles:
That looks antisemitic
Anyway this is just par for the course with anti-Americans these days. They latch on to, fall in love with, and shill for anyone who seems like he can pose a threat to the "American world order", which of course is a joke, since Putin comes nowhere near that power level. China will in the future if they don't tank their economy in the next 5 years or so (or we don't tank it for them, which we should), but the CCP is so much worse than the US on every metric that anyone willing to side with the CCP over the US is just evil.
You may think it's misleading, but I think it's relevant. It's absolutely related to the content of the article. He does say on the caption that the image is a work of fiction made by a fan of such dissolutions, not that it was part of that specific paper. Following the image link, it was used on the Ukrainian version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_Russia which presents many hypothetical situations where Russia could be broken up. The paper is one such hypothetical situation.
Yes it's obvious that the writer is biased on the side of Russia. I don't really care.
So what? He's on Russia's side in the war, and Putin is at least pretending to be doing this to defend Jews.
Nothing in the article calls for the breakup of Russia in any way. That meaning to "decolonializing" is a leap being taken by this tool without evidence.
Nearly all of Russia is full of ethnic Russians except for a few notable areas like Chechnya.
All of the Caucasus except the Krais has very few Russians. It may not be the near 100% of Chechnya but all the ethnic republics are overwhelmingly native. They've "even" left Abkhazia, ironically.