By definition, they are.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
and here we yet again see the conflation between "normal" and "okay". These assholes spent 2 decades telling us to accept the weird, and when we did, they then ordered us to stop calling it weird. There are 4 lights.
I would really like to be in a world where we accept the weird, but we still fucking call it weird, and weirdos have to simply acknowledge to themselves that they are indeed weirdos, and not normal.
I'm a fucking a weirdo in many ways - not gay, but I'm under no illusions that certain aspects of myself are unusual and even deleterious to myself. I would rather not be oppressed for it, but I also, actively, do not want my weirdness celebrated. Because I think a society that does anything more than largely ignore my weirdness as... fringe weirdo shit, is a society that's circling the drain.
Amen fellow weirdo, Amen.
That's my problem with this label; abnormal does not equal bad.
Regular excercise, in this day and age, is abnormal. Where I live, not being vaxxed is abnormal. Raising your kids outside of the public education system is abnormal etc, etc.
It also is a bit of a cop out. They're not actually saying it's bad either, just weird; what exactly are they implying?
I prefer the term hedonistic. There's no material benefit to society from homosexuality, it's purely for the enjoyment of those who partake. Therefore, while it shouldn't necessarily be banned (unless, you know, there was a good reason like our birth rates dropped below replacement levels), it should be treated like cigarettes, porn, or alcohol; no public advertising, possibly heavily taxed, and anyone pushing it on kids should be charged with child abuse.
The problem with letting people do degenerate things in the privacy of their homes is that they will eventually insist on making it public, and then making it mandatory.
The goal of LGBTQ and pride is to make straight abnormal. You're just 1 out of 200 alternative genders and sexualities. You don't even get a color on the rainbow.
Super Straight Pureblood reporting for duty. 🫡
"how does anal sex help us win the culture war?"
It;'s about time. Contrary to the typical neurotic fear of alienating voters, this ought to rally the base, especially in Texas.
More people should emphasize the fact that homosexuality is abnormal, behavior that deserves only toleration, not full acceptance. Granting gay couples legal marriage status was a mistake, evidently. Now politically you have to roll over for degeneracy to be "tolerant." But toleration is being destroyed by the garbage issuing from the trans/gay lobby. If you express revulsion at having gay sex or sex with a neutered creature imitating a woman you're labelled a "bigot."
It doesnt even deserve toleration. It has led to the destruction of every civilization that has even tolerated it.
Realistically, we'll probably never see a purge of homosexuals from the US, as much as that might quiet things down a bit and help preserve the nuclear family.
Let me guess, by "anti-LGBTQ platform", they mean banning grooming kids into transgenderism at school, keeping age-inapropriate sex-ed material out of classrooms, banning grooming them at public libraries, and keeping female special divisions for sports actually female?
Oh no. Anyway...
most certainly.
Every civilization that accepted homos collapsed. Rome. Sodom and Gomorrah. Just to name the big ones.
https://youtu.be/DRuOp_AkwKY
I don't know if I agree, although it perhaps depends on the definition of 'gay'.
It strikes me as pretty abnormal to be exclusively attracted to the same sex, but it seems common enough to be in the bounds of normal to be on some level, to some degree, bisexual.
I think there are relatively few 'homosexuals' who are never attracted to the opposite sex - There are doubtless millions of 'gay' men with wives and children.
There's large sub-sect of 'gays' that just men who are just not picky about who they stick their dick into so long as they relieve the urge to cum in something at the end of the day. Post-Kinsey we've called these people 'bisexual' or 'pansexual', but I can't help but feel that this is perhaps a relatively normal response to a libido that outstrips the availability of opposite sex partners.
Among 'gay' women, the term 'gold star lesbian' exists to describe a lesbian who has never had sex with a man, and it exists because the overwhelming majority of 'lesbians' are in fact women fleeing bad experiences with men and looking for an alternative.
The increased misogyny of gay men (part of why they love drag so much is because it is effectively a blackface minstrel show version of a woman) also points to a sub-sect of heterosexual men fleeing bad experiences with women, perhaps attracted to the female body, but (understandably) repulsed by the female mind.
[EDIT] Don't silently downvote me, you cowardly faggots. Argue with me.
nigga you gay
In all seriousness, wanting to have sex with anything that is not the opposite sex of your species is indeed abnormal. Most people don't swing that way.
And yet we are all aware of the reputation of what goes on behind closed doors in all-male schools. Stereotypes about the navy (before they filled it with women, anyway), and the term 'prison gay'.
Otherwise heterosexual males, for lack of an available female, begin to engage homosexual activity out of sexual boredom.
We're all aware of the 'anti-gay preacher' gets caught fucking others dudes. stereotype, too. These are often men with families.
It looks to me like any man not getting laid as much as he'd like to can end up getting bored enough that any hole looks good enough.
Fair, but all of this is alleviated with...ahem...self relief. Abstinence policies in highschools, for instance, have always led to more unprotected and reckless sex amongst students. Most people who keep themselves sane, either through a lover or their right hand, stay hetero.
Indeed they do, but now we're at the the question of what the threshold for 'abnormal' is.
Ginger hair is vastly less common than homosexuality, except in Ireland and Scotland, where it soars to 10-15 percent. For comparison, Homosexuality is estimated at aroun 7-10%.
So when we call being gay 'abnormal', well.... how gay, how abnormal?.
A lot of 'gay' men have lived very normal lives with a wife and child and some degenerates they see on weekends. How much less normal are they than the men who have lived the same life, but with mistresses on the side?
I'd rather we didn't go back victorian levels of anti-sodomy and just went back to being able to openly ridicule them - you know? Just how we can openly ridicule people with ginger hair. You can just say they have no souls and assume they're illegitimate bastard children.
I don't want to outright persecute homsexual acts. I want to ridicule them and openly express my amusement and disgust. I don't want to tell a man he can't have breast implants and chop his dick off. I want to openly, freely laugh at him if he does.
Japan has managed to do this for like, 600+ years. Why can't we?
On that we agree. I find it rude to ridicule a person, but being rude is not a crime and things that are worthy of ridicule are subjective. We've gotten to the point where being made fun of for being weird is now considered "oppression", and too many weirdos are afraid to be weird without the whole world bending over backwards to tell them its okay.
Being weird should always require some mental fortitude. One must be able to own their weirdness and take ridicule in stride. An adult who does not become vulnerable when being made fun of will automatically command respect. A child who must cower in a safe space will always be mocked. If you can't take the mockery then keep it to yourself, you'll only make yourself and others uncomfortable otherwise.
This is how I handle my weirdness, and it has allowed me to lead a healthy and fulfilling life.
And that's what really irks me. Being a weirdo has been opened up to, hell, outright SOLD TO people who need constant validation and crave attention.
These are the absolute last people you want to be weird, because they are incapable of being critical of themselves. They can't draw a line in the sand and say 'I'm being too fucking weird, it's time to reel myself in'. So instead of a guy with a boyfriend you get a guy with HIV and Herpes who knowingly gives HIV and Herpes to 10 different men every week and thinks that's okay.
All that you’re describing are the impacts of the sex permissive society we live in and the lack of morals. That doesn’t get to determine what normality is because it results from a break in the norm. It would be like establishing an ethical treatment of children based on the fact that some people groups would kill one twin when they were born. Even if it’s ‘normal’ for that people group numerically, it shouldn’t be a normative thing to do.
It wasn't normative until the schools started teaching it and media was allowed to push it on kids.
We need it out of the schools, and out of media aimed at children. We need diversity quotas outlawed.
That will put an end to the normalization.
If the GOP starts actually opposing the Banker's minions, they may end up accidentally going up against the banker's themselves.