The US Marshals were there on site and stopped people from intervening. Odds on them being the reason the police chief ordered his men to stand out? Also they could have engaged him before he got to the school but didn't
Comments (22)
sorted by:
The batches of crisis actors weren't as good this time around. I expected more emotion coming from the actors who pretended to be saddened their kid was involved.
Well there's always next time.
Link?
If there was some conspiracy from the top to hide what was happening inside, I doubt the local police would let themselves take the blame for just doing what they were told. I know the border patrol were there.
Seems odd that marshals are threatening people if they weren't involved in a way they'd be liable for
https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2022/06/05/uvalde-mother-who-ran-into-school-describes-being-handcuffed-saving-kids-during-shooting-im-going-in-there/
Thanks.
You're welcome. Seems like there's even more shit that the fed is trying to help cover up alongside the local PD
2nd for sauce, otherwise OP is a faggot
Here cock sucker
https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2022/06/05/uvalde-mother-who-ran-into-school-describes-being-handcuffed-saving-kids-during-shooting-im-going-in-there/
Faggot designation revoked
Conversion Therapy Rating: Success
I don't believe that the mother was threatened by the US Marshalls, and she didn't specify who threatened her anyway.
The feds don't have jurisdiction over an active shooter just because they were bigger. It's genuinely a local town issue. Although it would have been improper and evil, they absolutely could have ignored the entire shooting and walked away. The school is going to be the jurisdiction of the local police.
She was not there in the initial moments of the shooting. She arrived after a perimeter had been set up. No one is allowed to cross the perimeter because it will only add to confusion and likely cause more people to be shot, including by the police who are not going to understand why their perimeter collapsed and now they can't focus on the active shooter, and have to deal with parents running around the school.
The initial confrontation between the shooter and law-enforcement is still vague. It's not clear what happened there because the initial reports appear to have been wrong.
You're applying logic to an emotional argument. The point is not that in this specific aspect the police were following procedure (they were) but in driving home the visual that the police will refuse to act while preventing anyone else from acting.
If they had held parents down while officers were moving to take out the shooter, it would have been justifiable and correct, and there would be no emotional resonance with people who respond to that sort of thing... which is almost everyone who doesn't think children should fade away in an ambulance after lying in a pool of their own blood for an hour while the police literally sat on bike racks and car hoods outside.
I don't care about the emotional argument, because these are responses to OP's insinuation that the Feds basically false flagged the shooting. I'm attempting to point out that his insinuations don't make sense from the reality on the ground.
Where did I say they false flagged you retard?? There's zero insinuation of that
Just like Garland https://gellerreport.com/2018/02/fbi-dodge-garland-lawsuit.html/
What would the motive for this sort of thing be? Seems like high-risk, no-reward.
It's usually speculated that they do it to increase public support for more gun restrictions, with the assumption that American ownership of firearms is what's preventing the blue helmets from taking us over.
One part of the conspiracy I never bought is the stuff about crisis actors. Personally I'm black pilled enough to believe the elites in charge would actually mass murder children to get what they want. They'd just have to push the lunatics they are already monitoring to take the plunge. So I don't see what they would need to hide in a situation like this. The Las Vegas shooting was always a suspicious one though.
Actual false flags almost never involve a direct false flag attack. Even Hitler's false flag attack on Poland is the exception to the rule. Killing your own people exceedingly rare when causus belli is actually quite easy to get from using propaganda on accidents or separate incidents that you know you weren't involved in.
Honestly, attacking your own people is basically an admission that you don't have control over the media or public perception on a specific issue. And that's one thing you need to have before you start a war in the first place. Crisis actors just don't make any sense from a practical perspective.
They absolutely mass murder children, that's what the drone program is for. Also they use children as sex slaves. So, it's not like it's an ethical barrier. It's just not necessary.
The Vegas shooting was supposedly (if you take the conspiracy stuff at face value) supposed to be a hit on the Saudi royal family, as they were staying in that hotel at the same time, but idk about that, as I honestly haven't read all the way into that.
My good friend had a friend from college who was in Vegas that night who believes he saw another shooter that night in a casino, there used to be cell phone video that guy took online, probably still is.
Maybe he just saw security guys running through the casino, but my understanding is he heard/recorded shots fired.
Either way, everyone knows more happened that night than what we were told.
Frankly, a lot of people, even cops, got confused by the sound of gunfire bouncing off walls and buildings. It's pretty normal, but you're not going to know that in an active shooter situation unless you're trained in it.
More generally it also gives the left an issue to bank on going into an election they’re likely to lose basically everywhere. Take away the leaked thing on abortion and this and all you’d have is them having epically failed on all fronts.
The same reason our bureaucratic agencies usually fuck up. Malice and incompetence. How many times have they allowed a mass shooting or terrorist attack because they couldn't be fucked to do anything? At this point I assume malice when it comes right at politically convient times. I also wouldn't put it past them to be encouraging it through online forums like with the Whitmer "kidnapping"