"HR is watching, everywhere, and we hate you. We hate you. We hate you so much."
This is the face of your enemy, just so you know.
She's absolutely right, they will absolutely do anything in their power to fucking destroy you.
The good news is that when the bubble pops, this part of the racket will be out on the street because they made sure to kill their own business rather than hire you.
This is why you have to save your money, invest in assets, and divest from the financial and corporate establishment. Make your money with smaller businesses with local people that you can become familiar with. People who don't have HR departments. If you can, start your own businesses, and at the very least: create a side hussle.
If you don't these people will force you to do that anyway when they blacklist you from the entire industry (as she promised), and so your only solution to that is to be already doing that when it inevitably happens.
This is what the "oppressed" turn into when they get power. Guaranteed she got her job through some affirmative action program or nepotism; there's no way someone could be so bad at their job and get hired. She's literally doing the opposite of her "friendly advice".
I think the power mad naturally gravitate toward jobs like this, where you have the power to determine someone's future livelihood. Same instinct is rife among politicians, cops, and petty bureaucrats everywhere. They get off on crushing random people. It makes them feel important.
This is what happens when you give someone who is weak of strength and will an ounce of power. It's why I hate that line from the Captain America movie. Weak people don't know how to wield power responsibly. Typically the wield it with incredible maliciousness and a hunger for revenge.
It's also why they don't want people to be armed. If you gave these Karens guns, they'd be likely to kill at least someone, regardless of the charges. If you gave them that power without accountability, they'd kill half the people they'd meet.
They got a sliver of power, and now they intend to abuse that power until they can get you to kill yourself.
This is where the "guns kill people, not people kill people" thinking comes from.
They lose self control when they hold one. They feel power. And because they're solipsistic in their thinking, but also cannot accept blame, they have to transfer blame to an inanimate object instead.
"I would never kill someone, but when I had the gun, I did. I wouldn't have been tempted if I didn't". - No, they were always tempted to kill someone, they just didn't have an easy out.
In fact, not only do I agree there will be a correction (both in the economic and political sense), I think that I agree with Kurt Schlicter about what the longer term danger is. That being that its seeming increasingly likely that while a new Reagan would be the optimal path out for the country in the long term, we are increasingly staring down the possibility of an American Caesar. Because if the Elites/Fabians/Globalist, in their retarded harebrained schemes and lust for power, cause enough damage, it may be possible for the Caesar to come in and say that the Republic is dead, and that he can offer revenge on the people who murdered it. And he will dismantle anything that stands in the way of doing that (after all, the republic is already dead).
And that sounds nice and glorious when you have an Augustus or Marcus Aurelius in charge. But becomes a lot less good for the nation when you inevitably get a Nero or Caligula in charge.
I actually don't think that's the case. There's really only one time where there has been anything close to that that didn't come form the political Left, and it was under Lincoln, and that was the religious zealots giving him free reign. And for his trouble, you'll recall he caught a bullet.
There's just not going to be a right-wing American Caesar, or even an American Thermodorian Reaction.
What we're seeing on the political right is American Liberalism. As in, "conservativism" in America, means a return to it's Liberal Revolutionary roots, and our enemies are the Leftists explicitly. Where, in the American Revolution, there were the people who followed Rouseau, and diefied the Founding Fathers, those proto-Leftists (like Hamilton) are the the political right's enemies.
What we have here is a coalition of people on the right who are replicating the anti-Federalists versus the Federalists (and their party specifically). Even within Trump and DeSantis, the political right is not unified around a Caesar, and we are not prepared to tolerate one, because any would violate someone's principles and break the coalition. Instead, we rally around our opposition to the Left, and are prepared to evoke our own paths, that we agree to separately take in our own territories.
The Left is prepared to follow anyone strong into battle, and they have no one.
The Right is prepared to follow each faction separately: the Libertarians with Paul, the MAGA chuds with Greene, the Catholics with Cruz, the militarists with Crenshaw, but none are prepared to tolerate any one as Sovereign Supreme. Even Trump is not actually that man. He was a compromise between the factions who managed to fight, and not necessarily annoy all of us at the same time.
In the end, the real threat of an American Ceasar would come from the Left, who might even bring the right-wing racialists and protectionists on their side. But that would require a kind of Leftist Nationalist. Like, a fucking Tito. And while that could happen, the Left is too entrenched in it's own incompetence to do that.
This has been going on for longer than either of us have been alive, and 'the correction' is still nowhere in sight. Instead, it just keeps getting fucking worse. It's been one direction, ever further left, every year, for over a century.
There has been no correction in all that time. Why do you think you're gonna live to see one?
I think we're talking about two completely different things.
Perpetual inflation can be maintained for quite a long time when you reset the entire financial and monetary system every 40 years, and re-organize it. That's happened multiple times since 1900.
When I say correction, I mean a major economic correction, like a massive recession that is going to destroy a fuckton of wealth by eradicating a swath of the debt/currency. The last time that happened was 2008, and I think the next one is going to be much bigger. I think we are already in the beginning stages of that correction.
It sounds like you think I'm saying that there will be an incident where the fiat currency will re-value to it's full, pre-inflationary, value. However, I wouldn't say that, that basically hasn't ever happened in history. Instead, what happens is the fiat currency becomes effectively worthless, and a monetary reset has to occur, or a new currency has to be introduced, and I think that's going to happen by 2030 at the latest because this recession will probably smash the current petro-dollar system permanently. The whole thing nearly killed itself in 1998, and was staved off in 2001, and then staved off in 2008, and the long, slow, barely moving recovery that took until 2014 was a way of staving off a collapse again.
The US fiscal and currency system is dying, and that's why the global elite are pushing for a Great Reset. The introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies is exactly what it's about because the current monetary system can't be maintained.
The only thing close to a "full re-valued correction" would be a termination of a fiat currency for the US and the introduction of some kind of metal or block-chain based currency that the government doesn't have the right or power to adjust. Those kinds of currency changes have happened in the past, but normally happen after pretty much total economic collapse (like the old US Continental Dollars, prior to the creation of the constitution).
The problem I see is that the recession could very quickly turn into a depression, and such an outcome could happen. Not that it will, but that it could. I couldn't say that about any other economic situation in the US after 1933. Between 1933 and 2016 there was a 0% chance of that outcome. 2016-2020, there was a 1% chance. I think from 2020-2030 it might be a 10%-20% chance.
So, what you're thinking could happen, but it wasn't what I was talking about.
This is the face of your enemy, just so you know.
She's absolutely right, they will absolutely do anything in their power to fucking destroy you.
The good news is that when the bubble pops, this part of the racket will be out on the street because they made sure to kill their own business rather than hire you.
This is why you have to save your money, invest in assets, and divest from the financial and corporate establishment. Make your money with smaller businesses with local people that you can become familiar with. People who don't have HR departments. If you can, start your own businesses, and at the very least: create a side hussle.
If you don't these people will force you to do that anyway when they blacklist you from the entire industry (as she promised), and so your only solution to that is to be already doing that when it inevitably happens.
This is what the "oppressed" turn into when they get power. Guaranteed she got her job through some affirmative action program or nepotism; there's no way someone could be so bad at their job and get hired. She's literally doing the opposite of her "friendly advice".
I think the power mad naturally gravitate toward jobs like this, where you have the power to determine someone's future livelihood. Same instinct is rife among politicians, cops, and petty bureaucrats everywhere. They get off on crushing random people. It makes them feel important.
This is what happens when you give someone who is weak of strength and will an ounce of power. It's why I hate that line from the Captain America movie. Weak people don't know how to wield power responsibly. Typically the wield it with incredible maliciousness and a hunger for revenge.
It's also why they don't want people to be armed. If you gave these Karens guns, they'd be likely to kill at least someone, regardless of the charges. If you gave them that power without accountability, they'd kill half the people they'd meet.
They got a sliver of power, and now they intend to abuse that power until they can get you to kill yourself.
This is where the "guns kill people, not people kill people" thinking comes from.
They lose self control when they hold one. They feel power. And because they're solipsistic in their thinking, but also cannot accept blame, they have to transfer blame to an inanimate object instead.
"I would never kill someone, but when I had the gun, I did. I wouldn't have been tempted if I didn't". - No, they were always tempted to kill someone, they just didn't have an easy out.
Physiognomy is real. These people are all weak and hideous for a reason.
The slave morality in action.
Any day now, right?
The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.
Plan accordingly.
You think there's not going to be a correction? I'd like to hear your argument.
In fact, not only do I agree there will be a correction (both in the economic and political sense), I think that I agree with Kurt Schlicter about what the longer term danger is. That being that its seeming increasingly likely that while a new Reagan would be the optimal path out for the country in the long term, we are increasingly staring down the possibility of an American Caesar. Because if the Elites/Fabians/Globalist, in their retarded harebrained schemes and lust for power, cause enough damage, it may be possible for the Caesar to come in and say that the Republic is dead, and that he can offer revenge on the people who murdered it. And he will dismantle anything that stands in the way of doing that (after all, the republic is already dead).
And that sounds nice and glorious when you have an Augustus or Marcus Aurelius in charge. But becomes a lot less good for the nation when you inevitably get a Nero or Caligula in charge.
I actually don't think that's the case. There's really only one time where there has been anything close to that that didn't come form the political Left, and it was under Lincoln, and that was the religious zealots giving him free reign. And for his trouble, you'll recall he caught a bullet.
There's just not going to be a right-wing American Caesar, or even an American Thermodorian Reaction.
What we're seeing on the political right is American Liberalism. As in, "conservativism" in America, means a return to it's Liberal Revolutionary roots, and our enemies are the Leftists explicitly. Where, in the American Revolution, there were the people who followed Rouseau, and diefied the Founding Fathers, those proto-Leftists (like Hamilton) are the the political right's enemies.
What we have here is a coalition of people on the right who are replicating the anti-Federalists versus the Federalists (and their party specifically). Even within Trump and DeSantis, the political right is not unified around a Caesar, and we are not prepared to tolerate one, because any would violate someone's principles and break the coalition. Instead, we rally around our opposition to the Left, and are prepared to evoke our own paths, that we agree to separately take in our own territories.
The Left is prepared to follow anyone strong into battle, and they have no one.
The Right is prepared to follow each faction separately: the Libertarians with Paul, the MAGA chuds with Greene, the Catholics with Cruz, the militarists with Crenshaw, but none are prepared to tolerate any one as Sovereign Supreme. Even Trump is not actually that man. He was a compromise between the factions who managed to fight, and not necessarily annoy all of us at the same time.
In the end, the real threat of an American Ceasar would come from the Left, who might even bring the right-wing racialists and protectionists on their side. But that would require a kind of Leftist Nationalist. Like, a fucking Tito. And while that could happen, the Left is too entrenched in it's own incompetence to do that.
Well, when's it fucking coming?
This has been going on for longer than either of us have been alive, and 'the correction' is still nowhere in sight. Instead, it just keeps getting fucking worse. It's been one direction, ever further left, every year, for over a century.
There has been no correction in all that time. Why do you think you're gonna live to see one?
I think we're talking about two completely different things.
Perpetual inflation can be maintained for quite a long time when you reset the entire financial and monetary system every 40 years, and re-organize it. That's happened multiple times since 1900.
When I say correction, I mean a major economic correction, like a massive recession that is going to destroy a fuckton of wealth by eradicating a swath of the debt/currency. The last time that happened was 2008, and I think the next one is going to be much bigger. I think we are already in the beginning stages of that correction.
It sounds like you think I'm saying that there will be an incident where the fiat currency will re-value to it's full, pre-inflationary, value. However, I wouldn't say that, that basically hasn't ever happened in history. Instead, what happens is the fiat currency becomes effectively worthless, and a monetary reset has to occur, or a new currency has to be introduced, and I think that's going to happen by 2030 at the latest because this recession will probably smash the current petro-dollar system permanently. The whole thing nearly killed itself in 1998, and was staved off in 2001, and then staved off in 2008, and the long, slow, barely moving recovery that took until 2014 was a way of staving off a collapse again.
The US fiscal and currency system is dying, and that's why the global elite are pushing for a Great Reset. The introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies is exactly what it's about because the current monetary system can't be maintained.
The only thing close to a "full re-valued correction" would be a termination of a fiat currency for the US and the introduction of some kind of metal or block-chain based currency that the government doesn't have the right or power to adjust. Those kinds of currency changes have happened in the past, but normally happen after pretty much total economic collapse (like the old US Continental Dollars, prior to the creation of the constitution).
The problem I see is that the recession could very quickly turn into a depression, and such an outcome could happen. Not that it will, but that it could. I couldn't say that about any other economic situation in the US after 1933. Between 1933 and 2016 there was a 0% chance of that outcome. 2016-2020, there was a 1% chance. I think from 2020-2030 it might be a 10%-20% chance.
So, what you're thinking could happen, but it wasn't what I was talking about.