Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
Would talking about white genocide here get censored under the "whites here cannot attack nonwhite groups" rule?
posted 4 years ago by AzureAceStarburstXXX 4 years ago by AzureAceStarburstXXX +26 / -0

If you can't tell the truth about certain groups without being accused of attacking these groups, ask yourself why these groups hate the truth.

16 comments share
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

We don't have a rule like that.

There's a big difference between saying "Jews as a race are dedicated to the extermination of whites" and "In 1803 a white genocide was conducted in Hati by the revolutionary government that turned on their allies who were white, and forcibly married off surviving white women."

The first one is an identity based attack, seeking to balkanize the user-base into ethnic factionalism and sectarianism.

The second one is a statement of fact about a real genocide that actually occurred which nobody wants to talk about, and which the Left explicitly lies about. Unless the Leftists are White Nationalists Socialists who want to bring it up, or Black National Socialists who want to repeat it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– AbleistSL 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Does saying "Ashkenazi populations have a nasty history of ethnic nepotism, and that's why several of them are globalist conspirators and regressive leftism is rampant in the Jewish community." qualify as an identity based attack?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It's dancing the line because of "nasty history of ethnic nepotism", so I'd look at your context behind that to make a judgement.

The issue is about carefully drawing the line on the specificity & the root of the argument, for example:

  • Blacks commit a significant amount of crime - (no issue)
  • Blacks are commit a significant amount of crime, because of a culture ravaged by Leftism - (no issue)
  • Blacks are commit a significant amount of crime, because they are innately criminal - (Rule 16)
  • Blacks are inherently criminal - (Rule 16)
  • Blacks are criminal - (statement implies universal racial sentiment - Rule 16)
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– MattTheBlack 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

"It's da jews" meanwhile progressives are overwhelmingly white

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RealDrJester 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You do know that what you said is literally not true at all, right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– el_hoovy 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

sorry rabbi, baby dick sucking is not a service to Whites.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RealDrJester 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You do know that only a very small minority, smaller than you that does that retarded shit, right?

Oh well, guess you have no problem with nazi pedos. After all, your side didn't bat an eye to their crimes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Approved: Actually, the way this is worded is not an attack on an identity group.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy