Would talking about white genocide here get censored under the "whites here cannot attack nonwhite groups" rule?

posted 4 years ago by AzureAceStarburstXXX 4 years ago by AzureAceStarburstXXX +26 / -0

If you can't tell the truth about certain groups without being accused of attacking these groups, ask yourself why these groups hate the truth.

16 comments

16 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (16)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It's dancing the line because of "nasty history of ethnic nepotism", so I'd look at your context behind that to make a judgement.

The issue is about carefully drawing the line on the specificity & the root of the argument, for example:

Blacks commit a significant amount of crime - (no issue)
Blacks are commit a significant amount of crime, because of a culture ravaged by Leftism - (no issue)
Blacks are commit a significant amount of crime, because they are innately criminal - (Rule 16)
Blacks are inherently criminal - (Rule 16)
Blacks are criminal - (statement implies universal racial sentiment - Rule 16)

permalink parent save report block reply