Matt Walsh Responds to Troon Reaction to His Film Trailer
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
I think that this is unfortunately true for a lot of the people identifying as LGBTQ2SIA+ . And I mean, like, 1/4th of them. A lot of them are probably low value men & women who are seeking social value through this easy re-classification process.
It's one thing to think that there's a lot of gays and trannies acting as sex communists, it's a whole different kind of problem if you realize that a huge swath of them are straight, cis, men & women seeking to be valued and have any social support system...
For further proof of this, notice that the overwhelming majority of “gain” with the LGBT is Bisexuals. Which is as easy as saying you find a handful of same sex people attractive and then never actually doing anything.
(Note: I am not denying the existence of bisexuals. Just that it’s easy to fake).
No, I totally agree.
And it's not even that unreasonable for what is going to be considered "bisexual".
It's like the inverse of what happens in the Arab world. The phrase "women are for children, men are for pleasure."
You and another man fuck, or suck each other's dick on Man-Love-Thursday? That's not gay, don't be ridiculous. Being gay would be being married to a man, which is impossible, because you can't have children, so there'd be no reason to get married. Therefore, gays don't exist here since men can't marry each other. Obviously I can only be straight.
No I didn't make that up, that really is a sentiment.
The inverse is the situation for the westerner: you don't mind if your best friend offered you a blow job: bisexual. You're NOT straight and having a homosexual experience. You're bisexual. You're a fucking horn-dog and you don't care what hole it is as long as it's submissive? Again, you can't be straight. You're 16, confused, and you don't mind if your friend gives you a hand job, but you look back on it and thought it was weird? Permanently Bisexual. You saw a dude's dick in heterosexual porn? Bisexual.
Effectively, the Left is trying to poison the well so that any teen with any potential erotic experience, or even just a tolerance to homosexuality, can't be considered straight. They are weaponizing a definition to fit an agenda by creating a strawman of heterosexuality.
That is where TheImpossible1 gets it right. Not that there's a feminist plot to destroy boys, but a lot of uber feminists want that, and feminized culture created this. That young girls are affected too is just a side effect of their "men are the privileged sex" propaganda.
Not to say there aren't other reasons like the hypersexualization of youth, and the alphabet people being at the top of the oppression pyramid. Everyone wants to join the club.
Well, on that issue, he's not really wrong.
There's a metric fuckton of feminists who genuinely feel like the world is better without men, and are emasculating or feminizing boys because they are asserting that femininity is normal, and masculinity is a disease, or innately toxic. They don't raise boys as boys, they see boys as malfunctioning girls, which does irreversible damage.
Then they teach the bigotry, misandry, and sexism to girls. I can't tell you how often I heard "You have no idea how hard it is being a girl" by upper-middle class white girls growing up.
They're not trying to genocide boys. They'd just prefer men go extinct, and they think feminizing boys is good for them, even though it's destructive or even lethal.