I have never seen anyone make such sweeping assertions with so little knowledge and experience of the world.
Why precisely are you so mad at women to begin with? Is it a troon-like autistic fixation, or what? You have previously asserted that your mother is great, which I believe, and that the women in your relationships were not Godzilla, which I do not.
Spot on. I saw this exact same video earlier today and noticed two things in particular.
The first is what you said. The Left go out and riot; the Christian Republican types that constitute America's poor excuse for a 'Right-wing' go out and... pray... This kind of asymmetry regarding reactions greatly helps them move everything further in their direction each generation.
The second is the obvious racialization here. I don't think a whole bunch of white baby dolls was chosen coincidentally when she starts shouting about 'killing the babies'.
I agree with you on the first point. The right is utterly spineless, especially when the enemy is represented by women. It's a trait shared by far-right and center-right alike, interestingly.
I'm not sure about the second. It could be, but it could also just be a price thing. The whole black doll virtue signal is fairly new, I'm guessing getting one would be expensive just to break it in front of people who likely won't care. Better to go to goodwill and buy some crap a kid grew out of in 1995.
As funny as it would be to hit her with a kick more accurate than 90% of MLS players could manage (yes, they suck that hard), I was thinking someone would get up into her face and confront her. Just scare her into shutting up, without needing to act. She thought she owned the place, clearly.
I think standing firm and maintaining composure while insanity screams in your face is a few notches above "pathetic and weak." We've seen, with Sandmann and Rittenhouse, that there's a time to be stoic, and there's a time to retaliate.
Passivity in the face of violence is built in to Christianity. But, as usual, one can find contradictory biblical citations, in this case for both militant action and passivity.
Matthew 10:34-36:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
Sounds very prophetic when applied to the contemporary West if you ignore the last sentence.
Luke 6:29:
"And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also."
This would appear to be the ethic followed by the people witnessing the meltdown.
I have no verses to cite, but I don't believe God endorses supporting and tolerating evil.
The funny (not 'haha') thing is, if the WEF succeeds in reducing earths human population down to 500 million, they'll eliminate most evil toleratorsandevil doers. Aside from their own crimes and intentions, they'll automatically become the greatest force for good in thousands of years.
Comment Approved: This is kind of a tough one. I don't think anyone seems to be agreeing in this thread that Christians are innately degenerate or morally inferior. Even the term "cuckolded", is to say that something happened to Christians, rather than this being a defining trait of Christians themselves.
Margaret Atwood's always been postfeminist trash. Handmaid's Tale is not a very well-written nook and if it weren't for liberal dyke feminist professors forcing it onto students for 25 years, it would have been a minor feminist classic at best in the vein of Kathy Acker and Muriel Sparks' work.
The original NYT review from 1986 really highlights how ridiculous it is for Atwood to place the story in the US, since nothing in our modern society (especially the 80s!) suggested "Theocracy."
Atwood is hack. Reminds me of the old GWB days where every lame liberal in college would just mindlessly call him Hitler for no reason other than that's what their professors told them he was.
I was forced to read Cat's Eye in college. It sucked. All her books are feminist polemics and therefore boring as shit and annoying to anyone but a blue-haired man-hater.
The problem is not that there is one woman who is mentally ill and/or on drugs.
The problem is that her side actually applauds her.
But leftists are afraid to say anything bad about anything a black does, except be a conservative.
Ahh, the Brazillian maneuver.
It's a good tactic. Keep it up.
So is this nutcase for or against legal abortion on demand? My guess is "for."
Which god do you think these idiots are thanking for abortion?
This video is a perfect illustration of how cuckolded Christians are and how useless they will be in a war against feminism.
They can see the enemy. They have it right in front of them. Yet they won't say it.
I'm sure the church, which are majority female, will go along with what you call 'the enemy'.
No shit. I still remember the pathetic Pope claiming women are oppressed.
You're telling me something I already know. Two sides of the same exploitative coin.
Christians want you married to pump out babies to pad their numbers.
Women want you married so they can get into your wallet and claim their cash and prizes from the divorce.
Tale as old as Hesiod.
And why do you want that?
There's a 50% chance it's a girl.
Half-jokes aside, because I like being somewhat free?
I have never seen anyone make such sweeping assertions with so little knowledge and experience of the world.
Why precisely are you so mad at women to begin with? Is it a troon-like autistic fixation, or what? You have previously asserted that your mother is great, which I believe, and that the women in your relationships were not Godzilla, which I do not.
Because I'm typing this from [redacted] and not my birth country.
That's a good start.
How about you give an actual answer?
It is an actual answer. It's like asking a Cuban why they hate communists.
You wouldn't have left unless you hated women to begin with (which you clearly did), and it's silly to think anyone would fall for this.
I guess you realize you don't have a good answer.
What is this supposed to mean?
I only answer to the Orthodox Church. All others are blaspheme turned wormwood by Jesuits.
Spot on. I saw this exact same video earlier today and noticed two things in particular.
The first is what you said. The Left go out and riot; the Christian Republican types that constitute America's poor excuse for a 'Right-wing' go out and... pray... This kind of asymmetry regarding reactions greatly helps them move everything further in their direction each generation.
The second is the obvious racialization here. I don't think a whole bunch of white baby dolls was chosen coincidentally when she starts shouting about 'killing the babies'.
I agree with you on the first point. The right is utterly spineless, especially when the enemy is represented by women. It's a trait shared by far-right and center-right alike, interestingly.
I'm not sure about the second. It could be, but it could also just be a price thing. The whole black doll virtue signal is fairly new, I'm guessing getting one would be expensive just to break it in front of people who likely won't care. Better to go to goodwill and buy some crap a kid grew out of in 1995.
He does glow a bit, but he has a point. The enemy get up in people's faces and push them to act. We just stand around ranting to each other.
Do it the way our ancestors did.
Public hanging.
Leave the body to rot as a warning you others.
Public executions are based and necessary for a functional society.
As funny as it would be to hit her with a kick more accurate than 90% of MLS players could manage (yes, they suck that hard), I was thinking someone would get up into her face and confront her. Just scare her into shutting up, without needing to act. She thought she owned the place, clearly.
No, just continue being examples of the most pathetic and weak people ever.
I think standing firm and maintaining composure while insanity screams in your face is a few notches above "pathetic and weak." We've seen, with Sandmann and Rittenhouse, that there's a time to be stoic, and there's a time to retaliate.
Tolerating those people has been working out really well the past 50 years. We should keep doing it down to the last conservative.
Passivity in the face of violence is built in to Christianity. But, as usual, one can find contradictory biblical citations, in this case for both militant action and passivity.
Matthew 10:34-36: "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
Sounds very prophetic when applied to the contemporary West if you ignore the last sentence.
Luke 6:29:
"And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also."
This would appear to be the ethic followed by the people witnessing the meltdown.
I have no verses to cite, but I don't believe God endorses supporting and tolerating evil.
The funny (not 'haha') thing is, if the WEF succeeds in reducing earths human population down to 500 million, they'll eliminate most evil tolerators and evil doers. Aside from their own crimes and intentions, they'll automatically become the greatest force for good in thousands of years.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This is kind of a tough one. I don't think anyone seems to be agreeing in this thread that Christians are innately degenerate or morally inferior. Even the term "cuckolded", is to say that something happened to Christians, rather than this being a defining trait of Christians themselves.
Margaret Atwood's always been postfeminist trash. Handmaid's Tale is not a very well-written nook and if it weren't for liberal dyke feminist professors forcing it onto students for 25 years, it would have been a minor feminist classic at best in the vein of Kathy Acker and Muriel Sparks' work.
The original NYT review from 1986 really highlights how ridiculous it is for Atwood to place the story in the US, since nothing in our modern society (especially the 80s!) suggested "Theocracy."
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/03/26/specials/mccarthy-atwood.html
Atwood is hack. Reminds me of the old GWB days where every lame liberal in college would just mindlessly call him Hitler for no reason other than that's what their professors told them he was.
I was forced to read Cat's Eye in college. It sucked. All her books are feminist polemics and therefore boring as shit and annoying to anyone but a blue-haired man-hater.