Ever notice that all of the arguments about abortion don't include adoption?
I know the left also want to win by conversion, but they seem dead against adoption. They want the child converted by chosen folks, or dead.
Why hasn't anyone used this against them?
Because their argument is about forcing women to give birth. No where do they argue for or against the child. They know if they acknowledge the fetus as a human being all their arguments crumble.
You can't use a counterargument without an argument to counter.
They act as though having to live with the consequences of their actions is rape.
I would not want my offspring raised by someone else, perhaps some pedophile or SJW.
It is a rare woman who will want to part with her child once it's born. You're fighting against millions of years of evolution there.
I would love to believe that but I would not trust feminists to raise a boy.
I wouldn't trust feminists to raise a girl either.
It's not as if they're adopting though. Maybe the bulldykes.
I was just thinking about Mordred and Morgraine (Morgana) and how Morgraine used her son as a weapon, manipulated him since birth.
Old stories tend to embody traits that are seen in real persons, a feminist using her child as a weapon against the patriarchy makes sense.
If only. They abuse their kids in order to get social media brownie points. Now with all the great 'equality', it doesn't have to be a son.
This. This. This.
CPS should have a unit dedicated purely to dealing with this.
CPS is not fit for purpose in any Western country and shouldn't exist.
The local parents should fill the role of CPS.
I know people who were adopted that are in favor of abortion, which I always thought was pretty funny.
I've known people I wish were aborted.
I'm adopting right now. They can't even keep the website up to date on adoptions. I saw an 8 year old with 15,000 inquiries. There are far more trying to adopt than are up for adoption.
You are not thinking in the right direction. The kid has to be up for adoption to be adopted. The foster program is designed so that the parent will recover, become better, and then be given the child back. The state decides on this. A parent has to absolutely prove they are not coming back before the state let's the adoption process begin.
Every caseworker I've met has stories about foster parents praying to adopt the child in their home, who they have known and cared for for years. Almost none of them have those prayers answered.
Abortion would be the absolute example of "does not want" and would be up for adoption a lot faster if the mother says so.
Can confirm. My parents fostered, then adopted three siblings from an absolutely abhorrent mother who fought tooth and nail to keep them, despite neglecting and abusing them for years. They've all got horrid psychological scars from her treatment of them.
The state was on her side the whole time. Then, the moment she finally lost all rights, she dropped off the face of the earth, didn't want a thing to do with my siblings anymore. Her "motherly instincts" turned them to her property, rather than people she cared for. It's downright twisted....
I know stories like this as well.
Adoption interrupts their livestyles. Most would have to stop being tramps and whores long enough to give birth. Can't have that!