NYT: China And Russia Are Giving Authoritarianism A Bad Name
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Every. Single. Time.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
heres from the actual article that op was too gay to link in the comments.
THE SHITLIB READING IS OFF THE CHARTS!!!! THIS CANT BE!!!!
Unlike shitlibs who protected our elders (LOL, NO_)
He ends it by saying that china and russia are failing for those reasons. But it could just as easily be talking about here.
I do wonder this shitlibs opinion on banning tRumPF from social media. maybe thats how libs expose censoring lmao
nvm
the writer is your typical know it all shitlib.
I did link it in the comments.
Try looking next time.
Only retards believe in Conspiracies that never came true, despite centuries of existence.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: It's okay to call each other retards and faggots.
Friedman has multiple decades of bad takes under his belt. I remember him in the 90s.
The World is Flattened is more like it...
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Approved: This doesn't technically do that.
And, why? Explain to everyone here what you mean by that.
People are communicating just fine. They just aren’t going to trip your line so you can go crying to Dom about “muh identity attacks”, which, btw, is an embarrassing double standard on this board. There’s only one identity that is protected here, and this accomplishes nothing except proving the point.
Which identity is the only one protected here? And why?
does the term 'cunt-erogating' mean anything to you?
"Here's why Authoritarianism is actually a good thing, and 10 reasons why it will work perfectly this time as long as We are in charge!"
The Tweet:
https://archive.ph/6ebGO
NYT article:
https://archive.ph/GEdMI
The word they are looking for, or perhaps purposefully avoiding, is oligarchy.
they cram as much lies in as they can
china is not giving authoritarianism a bad name and russia is not (yet) authoritarian
The actual text of the article isn't horrible. Talking about how China and Russia are failing because they are authoritarian. Claims that democracy is authoritarianism's opposite, but that's to be expected.
The headline is the real travesty.
Democracy is authoritarian by the mob instead of a single person
Hmm?
Yes, there's a bunch of par-for-the-course bullshit asides. But, overall, it's still not making authoritarianism out to be a good thing, per se. It's just pretending that democracies can't be authoritarian.
No true authoritarianism /s
Fucking retards
No they fucking shouldn't. If you're going to execute a tyrant, do it cleanly, because the kind of sick bastard who wants to rape him to death shouldn't be a part of the political process.
Where did I say the angry mob of peasants would be part of the political process?
So you take some asshole who's in jail for it already to do it, just before you execute the thing.
Have you seen these people? Some of them do that for fun, I guarantee it.
Nope. Run 'em through the legal system like the common criminals that they are.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
I don't like it either but lets' calm down a bit.