KIA2.win noted by HN/ycombinator
(news.ycombinator.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
That's honestly an objective of both feds and activists.
It is true, that by definition, we are going to accrue some number of extremists for being banned literally everywhere else. However, given some shit that I've seen, and the utter incapability of some accounts to even discuss other topics, it seems like some portion of online Nazism is either Feds looking to create violence, crappy alt accounts by the alt-right, or other Leftist activists seeking to discredit all non-Leftist platforms by basically harassing users with incessant screaming about jews in literally every post that they can post on.
I forget who told me about "Forum Sliding" but that definitely appears to be partly the case in most of these communities.
the problem is rampant censorship has skewed the overton window so unnaturally far left that anything which isn't far left is immediately labeled nazi hate speech.
every single race has ethno-nationalist territories... except white people. hell, even blacks and jews have their own ethno-nationalist territory. but if you say whites should be allowed to have their own ethno-nationalist territory just as blacks and jews and muslims and asians and latinos do, suddenly, you're a nazi.
even citing basic racial stats nowadays is censored as alt-right hate speech. reality has such an anti-leftist bias nowadays that leftism only survives on forums with extreme censorship. and so long as we continue to accept these retarded extremist definitions of what constitutes racism and hate speech, any site that doesn't engage in heavy censorship will inevitably become anti-leftist.
That's absolutely not true, it's just that the white people that do, you don't consider to be "politically" white. Most European countries that are solidly white are also heavily Leftist, because white people invented Leftism. It originates from France and Germany, from Rousseau and Hagel, and they emerge when each of those places was (what we would consider) nearly monoracial or monoethic, even if they didn't see it that way. Alternatively, most ethnic and racial groups don't care to form ethnic or racial solidarity movements because that is a Leftist invention.
Do you hear yourself? These statements don't even make sense.
Asian ethno-nationalism? There's so many sub-groups with thier own ethnic tensions, that the concept shouldn't even be applied to "asians". The same can certainly be said for latinos and blacks, it's just that American blacks have been accepting communist racial narratives since WEB DuBouis. Muslim ethno-nationalism, that's not even possible. Muslims don't even have a race. Muslims aren't concerned with ethnic issues, those are subordinate to religious interpretation.
you're BSing the wrong guy here... you've never been to asia or even looked up stats on nationalism in asia... less than 4% of japanese people speak english, and less than 1% of people in japan are not of 50%+ japanese descent. this is because japan does not allow dual citizenship, and if you want to keep your japanese citizenship when you're half japanese, you have to start the process in your 20s or you lose it forever. korea, singapore, and many other asian countries play the same game. go live in japan for a couple years and come back and tell us all there's no ethno-nationalism.
and nothing you said debunks the greater point... that leftism is so fucking delusional today that it completely depends on extreme censorship of simple facts to keep the overton window far left.
He didn't say no ethno-nationalism in Asia. He said no Asian ethno-nationalism. As in Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, and Malay all united under Asian Pride.