This results in the top 80% of women pursuing only the top 20% of men
This has been the case since prehistory. Reproduction for women is biologically expensive, it makes sense for them to be as selective as they can be, selecting the "strongest".
Civilization requires "oppression" of a woman's natural inclinations to fuck chad(s) and using social and cultural (and sometimes physical) means to pair her off with below a 80% man.
The below 80% men get a mate without having to fight for her and civilization benefits from men who labor or specialize in trades other than warfare.
"Womens' Rights" is the rolling back of this social contract and removing any obstacles to women egagin in their primary directives: 1. fuck chad, 2. attention whore, 3. avoid accountability.
We would all prefer to get a top tier mate, but that's impossible in real life. Top tier mates can choose anyone they wish to partner with, but they almost universally choose other top tier mates. The people that are left do the same, down the line, until everyone is coupled. That's why the study of real life dating (in person) that Jordan Peterson showed is so important. It showed that even though everyone was highly selective, once people began to couple, and were removed from the dating market, it forced women to choose and settle down, otherwise they would be left alone, which is far more dangerous than selecting a less attractive mate than they would otherwise prefer. This resulted in women settling with a man relatively within their attractiveness range, rather than constantly pursuing top tier men.
This is why social media and dating apps are so bad for men, and women. It gives women a nearly endless supply of top tier men, and thus they are never forced to settle. It's also why the constant sexual degeneracy and attack on traditional marriage is so crucial for globalists.
This has been the case since prehistory. Reproduction for women is biologically expensive, it makes sense for them to be as selective as they can be, selecting the "strongest".
Civilization requires "oppression" of a woman's natural inclinations to fuck chad(s) and using social and cultural (and sometimes physical) means to pair her off with below a 80% man.
The below 80% men get a mate without having to fight for her and civilization benefits from men who labor or specialize in trades other than warfare.
"Womens' Rights" is the rolling back of this social contract and removing any obstacles to women egagin in their primary directives: 1. fuck chad, 2. attention whore, 3. avoid accountability.
I agree with you.
We would all prefer to get a top tier mate, but that's impossible in real life. Top tier mates can choose anyone they wish to partner with, but they almost universally choose other top tier mates. The people that are left do the same, down the line, until everyone is coupled. That's why the study of real life dating (in person) that Jordan Peterson showed is so important. It showed that even though everyone was highly selective, once people began to couple, and were removed from the dating market, it forced women to choose and settle down, otherwise they would be left alone, which is far more dangerous than selecting a less attractive mate than they would otherwise prefer. This resulted in women settling with a man relatively within their attractiveness range, rather than constantly pursuing top tier men.
This is why social media and dating apps are so bad for men, and women. It gives women a nearly endless supply of top tier men, and thus they are never forced to settle. It's also why the constant sexual degeneracy and attack on traditional marriage is so crucial for globalists.