57 First ‘Woman’ Black Supreme Court Nominee Won’t Define ‘Woman’ (www.breitbart.com) posted 2 years ago by YesMovement 2 years ago by YesMovement +57 / -0 19 comments share 19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
She's tweeted that the original intent of the constitution would have her in chains (despite the fact you'd never know the United States allowed slavery by reading the constitution) so you'd be correct.
she should be in chains, but not for any reason she thinks
She should be redacted.