The last one, 1 year with probation. 12 months, 16 isn't that much of a difference.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
I'm surprised how far they went to appease the race war cult, even though women control it and could have just hidden it.
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
When I saw the prosecution drop the sentencing guideline, I knew it was going to be the literal minimum sentence or close to it.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
I predicted 1 year prison + 9 probation
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, if you haven't worked out yet that these race movements cover for female privilege and provoke division in men, you never will.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.
1-6? 0-7. What was the prediction you got right? Your last one was that she would get probation.
I'm not even taking issue with the pessimism of your predictions, but that they are wildly implausible.
But at least you're learning.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.