She should have been acquitted, since she had every right to shoot that career criminal.
Prepare for crime to get even more out of control. If you have to shoot anyone who is black, the criminal terror regime come after you like Stalin went after Kamanev.
Because the low sentence was not because she was a woman. It was commensurate with a previous sentence handed down from a few years back. Add to the fact that she shouldn’t have served any time to begin with for icing a degenerate career criminal, and is only serving jail time because the dude was black.
Tasers don't even feel like handguns. I don't care if you've got some adrenaline in your system, if you're incapable of recognizing which weapon you're drawing, you don't belong on the force.
It's one thing to make bad predictions. We all do sometimes. It's quite another to make them with absolute certainty, when your predictions are so wildly implausible. It shows a lack of understanding of what is likely to happen.
But not even that. It's that when you were wrong about your first two, you didn't miss a beat and moved on to your next predictions, made with an equal amount of certainty, which turned out to be equally wrong.
There was no way she would face an actual sentence proportionate to her crime
Which is an acquittal.
and I just continued getting surprised by how far they took the farce.
Except that close to this exact same thing happened about 10 years ago, and the police officer there got... 1.5 years. You're not whining about that one, because the cop wasn't a woman, so you don't assume that it was a part of The Genocide.
The last one, 1 year with probation. 12 months, 16 isn't that much of a difference.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
I'm surprised how far they went to appease the race war cult, even though women control it and could have just hidden it.
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
When I saw the prosecution drop the sentencing guideline, I knew it was going to be the literal minimum sentence or close to it.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
I predicted 1 year prison + 9 probation
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, if you haven't worked out yet that these race movements cover for female privilege and provoke division in men, you never will.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.
She should have been acquitted, since she had every right to shoot that career criminal.
Prepare for crime to get even more out of control. If you have to shoot anyone who is black, the criminal terror regime come after you like Stalin went after Kamanev.
Ah right, we should all have 'seen' that she just wanted to kill a man because she hates men.
You have less of an excuse. People who believe that, are manipulated by propaganda. You spin your own tales and then choke on your own propaganda.
Imp, you need to seriously tone down your woman hate-boner for a second.
Because the low sentence was not because she was a woman. It was commensurate with a previous sentence handed down from a few years back. Add to the fact that she shouldn’t have served any time to begin with for icing a degenerate career criminal, and is only serving jail time because the dude was black.
Search your heart, you know it’s true.
Yes it is lmao. Happens to cops fairly often.
Tasers don't even feel like handguns. I don't care if you've got some adrenaline in your system, if you're incapable of recognizing which weapon you're drawing, you don't belong on the force.
Stunning and brave. Don't care.
Should be 0 since she iced a degenerate criminal.
Of course, pork pass and pussy pass.
She made the mistake but the guy running when cops are telling you to stop made the bigger mistake. I thought she would get more time
It's one thing to make bad predictions. We all do sometimes. It's quite another to make them with absolute certainty, when your predictions are so wildly implausible. It shows a lack of understanding of what is likely to happen.
But not even that. It's that when you were wrong about your first two, you didn't miss a beat and moved on to your next predictions, made with an equal amount of certainty, which turned out to be equally wrong.
Which is an acquittal.
Except that close to this exact same thing happened about 10 years ago, and the police officer there got... 1.5 years. You're not whining about that one, because the cop wasn't a woman, so you don't assume that it was a part of The Genocide.
Come again? What is 7-10 years? I mean another case where the cop accidentally pulled his gun instead of his taser.
It's unfair that either of them have to spend any time in prison. But there is only one aspect that you fixate on.
1-6? 0-7. What was the prediction you got right? Your last one was that she would get probation.
I'm not even taking issue with the pessimism of your predictions, but that they are wildly implausible.
But at least you're learning.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.