Several frames starting at the 23 second mark on the exhibit are looped together in the "New Graphic video," creating the impression that the officer swinging a baton in the background does so not three but several times. In both videos the scene goes out of shot as the officer wearing the bodycam appears to collapse to the ground, providing another indication that the footage is indeed the same.
Well three baton strikes to the head is still more that saint Floyd got.
It is a compilation of short segments of other videos spliced together to mislead.
Full videos provide the context of the scene, where officers were trying to drag back and protect an officer that lay on the ground next to Boyland. One officer attempted to hit back at a man in the crowd wielding a hockey stick, a moment that can be clearly seen in the full-length videos, but not in the heavily-doctored viral video. Finally, claims that Boyland died at the hands of the police are also false, as the coroner's report stated a drug overdose was the cause of death.
Their argument is literally, well it’s not new, we can’t definitely say the woman was beat to death and the coroner said drug overdose! This is also why they slipped in the buzzword “new”. This is journalism in a nutshell.
This scenario sounds familiar somehow...
Well three baton strikes to the head is still more that saint Floyd got.
Surprised it wasnt a covid diagnosis.
Their argument is literally, well it’s not new, we can’t definitely say the woman was beat to death and the coroner said drug overdose! This is also why they slipped in the buzzword “new”. This is journalism in a nutshell.
Strange how they're willing to take a fine-tooth comb to this and nothing else that might challenge the narrative.
It's because she's a woman. Women ALWAYS get special treatment because they are secretly in charge of everything!
Cool fact checking.
how did these faggots cover blm?
"someone was killed by police or something"