Funny, I would never fight in a war where I was fighting alongside women.
I woman's place is at home having children and raising children.
The better reason not to fight a war in Ukraine is because the USA are literally the bad guys in the war. Ukraine is selling its soul to the USA for protection from Russia which is all part of the plan against Ukraine by the USA. Under no circumstance, even if women were drafted, should any American go to war in Ukraine.
I think we need more wars. Wars where we could potentially lose and lose big. Looking back on society, it seems to me that the best societies were warring societies and the worst societies were peaceful ones. When the stakes are high, a lot of the clown world stuff going on would never be allowed to go on. We just need to ensure the right people are at risk of losing the war. Not the frontline soldiers but the rich and powerful people in society that have the power to change things. Once they are at risk because of war, I think things would improve. Also, as more people die from wars, a woman's use in society quickly becomes children and children only, while men get valued higher than women in the sense that men are needed to fight to win the war which is a huge boost to men. And BTW having less men actually works to men's advantage. Supply/demand. With less men, the men who are left are worth considerably more as men thus they are more likely to get a better outcome for themselves. Arguably, our civilization as a species have evolved to always have a deficit of men. I do believe that is ideal. Wars strengthen us and peace makes us weak.
Women in the draft can work in a society like the USA where no real risk exists to the nation. In a true total war scenario, the draft for women would be rescinded to force women to have children to replenish the population.
Never forget how the JUDEOBOLSHEVIK Chekists killed all these Ukrainian Christians in the Real Holo!
(Curiously replacing them with the Russian settlers in the eastern Ukraine, and then not evacuating the local Jews when the German came. Moving the entire industries east across the Urals by train, but leaving all the Jews for dead. Peculiar priorities of a Jewish conspiracy.)
You guys now:
It's not our business if the selfidentified Chekists, with their oligarch friends of an Unspecified Ethnicity, kill the Ukrainians today to restore the Soviet Union, okay?
I'd at least expect some solidarity with the Right Sector and Azov Regiment types, but alas.
Anyway, literally all what America had to do was not to disarm Ukraine (and empower the "Russian partners") during the 1990s. Just do nothing.
Funny, I would never fight in a war where I was fighting alongside women.
I woman's place is at home having children and raising children.
The better reason not to fight a war in Ukraine is because the USA are literally the bad guys in the war. Ukraine is selling its soul to the USA for protection from Russia which is all part of the plan against Ukraine by the USA. Under no circumstance, even if women were drafted, should any American go to war in Ukraine.
Why do I get the feeling you just want a war with women drafted so you can go all Elliot Rodger on them all?
Can't you channel your hatred of women in a better way? Subjugate them.
Just a figure of expression.
Prevent what ever being used against us?
I think we need more wars. Wars where we could potentially lose and lose big. Looking back on society, it seems to me that the best societies were warring societies and the worst societies were peaceful ones. When the stakes are high, a lot of the clown world stuff going on would never be allowed to go on. We just need to ensure the right people are at risk of losing the war. Not the frontline soldiers but the rich and powerful people in society that have the power to change things. Once they are at risk because of war, I think things would improve. Also, as more people die from wars, a woman's use in society quickly becomes children and children only, while men get valued higher than women in the sense that men are needed to fight to win the war which is a huge boost to men. And BTW having less men actually works to men's advantage. Supply/demand. With less men, the men who are left are worth considerably more as men thus they are more likely to get a better outcome for themselves. Arguably, our civilization as a species have evolved to always have a deficit of men. I do believe that is ideal. Wars strengthen us and peace makes us weak.
Women in the draft can work in a society like the USA where no real risk exists to the nation. In a true total war scenario, the draft for women would be rescinded to force women to have children to replenish the population.
Buy feather pillows and bust them open. Can't help you find the tar though.
So basically all wars after the Napoleonic Wars. Generals stopped once paper was replaced by telephone wires.
Only feminists use the word 'gendered'.
So... which all-powerful woman are you blaming for this coming war again?
You can't possibly be that dumb.
You guys until recently:
(Curiously replacing them with the Russian settlers in the eastern Ukraine, and then not evacuating the local Jews when the German came. Moving the entire industries east across the Urals by train, but leaving all the Jews for dead. Peculiar priorities of a Jewish conspiracy.)
You guys now:
I'd at least expect some solidarity with the Right Sector and Azov Regiment types, but alas.
Anyway, literally all what America had to do was not to disarm Ukraine (and empower the "Russian partners") during the 1990s. Just do nothing.
Comment Reported for: 'Jews'
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks