Marvel is doing terribly. Star Wars is a pseudo-dead franchise. Its parks are overpriced and increasingly woke. Yeah, ESG is the only thing propping it up.
I've heard one mention of a Disney property among my relatively normie friends since Infinity War/Rise of Skywalker (outside of Spiderman) and it was that it was weird how Hawkeye only just now is getting his own thing considering he was in the first of those movies. That's it.
IIRC from Clownfish.TV covering it, it was a 70/30 split in Sony's favor for revenue. But more importantly, it was pretty much all Sony who came up with the story.
Marvel is doing terribly. Star Wars is a pseudo-dead franchise. Its parks are overpriced and increasingly woke. Yeah, ESG is the only thing propping it up.
I've heard one mention of a Disney property among my relatively normie friends since Infinity War/Rise of Skywalker (outside of Spiderman) and it was that it was weird how Hawkeye only just now is getting his own thing considering he was in the first of those movies. That's it.
Didn't the new Venom do pretty well?
They say the downgrade is because Disney+ is slowing down and having more spend on content than it deserves. 33bn this year, supposedly.
Sony would literally fucking die before it ever gives up the Spiderman license.
They own it purely out of spite.
Huh, TIL. Double boycotting that one, didn't know it was Soyny.
Spiderman is not Disney Marvel. That is Sony. I don't think Disney gets the Box Office Revenue, only the merchandising rights.
I think they may get a tiny bit out of the new ones because of the mcu characters that show up, but the lions share goes to Sony
IIRC from Clownfish.TV covering it, it was a 70/30 split in Sony's favor for revenue. But more importantly, it was pretty much all Sony who came up with the story.