Korea is a matriarchal hellhole. The men are universally fully demoralized. I wonder how things will change as Big Daddy USA pulls back protection their economy collapses.
That's... not going to happen. Samsung is their national pride and all but a national syndicate at this point. Korea ignored and changed laws for the company's benefit to improve their position in the world.
And this is why the globalist cabal is happy to leave Korea alone instead of badgering them to take more refugees. I think the social cohesion of South Korea was already at a crack as early as 70's and 80's where there was a deep corruption in the Korean politics. In the 21st century, everything took a nosedown. With that deep fracture in the internal level, why would elites be bothered trying to further break down the already fractured country?
The sheer lack of believability around the motives was followed by a financial corruption investigation, where they found a small amount of bribes.
They then charged everyone involved with corruption and buried it all.
The true President of SK at the time was called Choi Soon-Sil, she had access to everything and directed millions of won to her organizations. She was the primary confidante of the President, she was known to have written her speeches as well as given input on policy.
It's hard to find sources on this that aren't in Korean, by the way. Anyone with better search skills can take a shot.
That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
The scandal, as far as I know, is about cultism and bribery. Not dictating the president's agenda.
You did not answer this: Alright. What policies do you mean specifically [that are supposed to be pro-feminist], and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable?
The fact that there's no evidence for it, is proof that it's being censored because there's something "very uncomfortable"? What? By that standard, you can claim anything (and you do).
The fact that there's no evidence for it, is proof that it's being censored because there's something "very uncomfortable"
The fact there is no longer evidence for it.
It's not like the "Flat Earth" or other retarded bullshit (5G will kill you by cooking your brain with directed radiation!1!1!11!) . A lot of people remember reading exactly that, that South Korea was led by a feminist cult, back when it was first outed. Yet now, all of that has disappeared off the face of the Earth.
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".
Korea is a matriarchal hellhole. The men are universally fully demoralized. I wonder how things will change as Big Daddy USA pulls back protection their economy collapses.
They will end up at war with NK, but most men will refuse to go to war for "their" country.
Samsung will end up moving to the US.
That's... not going to happen. Samsung is their national pride and all but a national syndicate at this point. Korea ignored and changed laws for the company's benefit to improve their position in the world.
And this is why the globalist cabal is happy to leave Korea alone instead of badgering them to take more refugees. I think the social cohesion of South Korea was already at a crack as early as 70's and 80's where there was a deep corruption in the Korean politics. In the 21st century, everything took a nosedown. With that deep fracture in the internal level, why would elites be bothered trying to further break down the already fractured country?
The absolute fucking state of conservatives.
Why are first world nations like this?
Because anyone who would be a good leader is kept out by blackmail and rape accusations.
Imagine how much dirt Google has on everyone now, considering their OS is on every phone.
Are they, though, or is it just what journos - AP in this case - say conservatives are?
I suppose she'd want to be out of jail to witness the More Feminine Way herself, after being part of a secret organization to create it.
Repeating the exact same phrase in every single comment gets tiring.
If I say it enough, maybe it will stick.
Nah, it's just annoying.
So is getting jabbed every nine months.
Well, I'm not getting jabbed every nine months, but I do have to read your comments.
Aren't you European? I think you'll find you are.
Von der Leyen has yet to command the ECB to threaten member states to institute such a requirement. I think I'm safe.
Tell me about it.
You seriously don't know?
The sheer lack of believability around the motives was followed by a financial corruption investigation, where they found a small amount of bribes.
They then charged everyone involved with corruption and buried it all.
The true President of SK at the time was called Choi Soon-Sil, she had access to everything and directed millions of won to her organizations. She was the primary confidante of the President, she was known to have written her speeches as well as given input on policy.
It's hard to find sources on this that aren't in Korean, by the way. Anyone with better search skills can take a shot.
That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
The fact there was a whole scandal about it?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
The scandal, as far as I know, is about cultism and bribery. Not dictating the president's agenda.
You did not answer this: Alright. What policies do you mean specifically [that are supposed to be pro-feminist], and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
The fact that there's no evidence for it, is proof that it's being censored because there's something "very uncomfortable"? What? By that standard, you can claim anything (and you do).
The fact there is no longer evidence for it.
It's not like the "Flat Earth" or other retarded bullshit (5G will kill you by cooking your brain with directed radiation!1!1!11!) . A lot of people remember reading exactly that, that South Korea was led by a feminist cult, back when it was first outed. Yet now, all of that has disappeared off the face of the Earth.
According to my Google search 5 mins ago, she got 22 years in prison.
Did she? Can you show me the evidence then?
Yeah, so? I don't see how this backs up your claim of 'feminist cult' or that your Genocide beliefs are downplaying it.
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".