And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".