That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
The scandal, as far as I know, is about cultism and bribery. Not dictating the president's agenda.
You did not answer this: Alright. What policies do you mean specifically [that are supposed to be pro-feminist], and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable?
The fact that there's no evidence for it, is proof that it's being censored because there's something "very uncomfortable"? What? By that standard, you can claim anything (and you do).
That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
The fact there was a whole scandal about it?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
The scandal, as far as I know, is about cultism and bribery. Not dictating the president's agenda.
You did not answer this: Alright. What policies do you mean specifically [that are supposed to be pro-feminist], and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
The fact that there's no evidence for it, is proof that it's being censored because there's something "very uncomfortable"? What? By that standard, you can claim anything (and you do).