The sheer lack of believability around the motives was followed by a financial corruption investigation, where they found a small amount of bribes.
They then charged everyone involved with corruption and buried it all.
The true President of SK at the time was called Choi Soon-Sil, she had access to everything and directed millions of won to her organizations. She was the primary confidante of the President, she was known to have written her speeches as well as given input on policy.
It's hard to find sources on this that aren't in Korean, by the way. Anyone with better search skills can take a shot.
That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".
You seriously don't know?
The sheer lack of believability around the motives was followed by a financial corruption investigation, where they found a small amount of bribes.
They then charged everyone involved with corruption and buried it all.
The true President of SK at the time was called Choi Soon-Sil, she had access to everything and directed millions of won to her organizations. She was the primary confidante of the President, she was known to have written her speeches as well as given input on policy.
It's hard to find sources on this that aren't in Korean, by the way. Anyone with better search skills can take a shot.
That is not the question. I heard claims that this is a 'feminist cult' at the time, but when I later discovered that this was the daughter of the military dictator of Korea and supported by Korean conservatives, and could not find any confirmation of this being a 'feminist cult'.
So now I'm asking you. Can you actually substantiate that this (1) is a feminist cult and that (2) it provides any support for your theories whatsoever.
The fact that most of her policy, which was dictated by the cult leader, was pro-feminism?
It's really hard to find anything talking about it, I've been scrolling through pages of search results and found nothing but agitprop from the usual suspects downplaying it.
Alright. What policies do you mean specifically, and what is your evidence that it was 'dictated' by the cult leader?
That should tell you something. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
How do you know it is agitprop? Like I said, I once believed, but I simply found no evidence to support it - not that I spent hours on it. So should I dismiss this lack of evidence because it does not suit my prejudices?
The fact there was a whole scandal about it?
That it's being censored because it would reveal something very, very uncomfortable? It's not like feminist puppeted governments are anything new, the UK has one as I'm writing this, and the Chief Advisor to the PM even told everyone. Then you've got countries like France, led by someone who was molested as a child and married his molestor. Then you have the United States, led by someone who is so clearly senile, there's absolutely no way he isn't a puppet of someone.
Because if a feminist said the sky was blue, it would turn bright green. They aren't capable of truth.
According to my Google search 5 mins ago, she got 22 years in prison.
Did she? Can you show me the evidence then?
Yeah, so? I don't see how this backs up your claim of 'feminist cult' or that your Genocide beliefs are downplaying it.
And yes, she did. That's correct. She was charged with corruption over said bribes. 22 years and she didn't even do 5.
It's not hard to look up the name yourself. Even Wikipedia admits that her devices contained extensive details relating to the President's decisions, as well as her attending briefings on the SK-NK situation.
You can't see how a secret handler of a world leader known for pushing feminist policy, in the most feminist country in the world, in a similar manner to how modern leaders seem to have female handlers, is relevant?
Because she was pardoned. Though if you are correct, and the bribes were indeed small (is it better if you are so corrupt that you can be bought for a penny?), then I don't see what basis you have for objecting to this.
But I didn't ask about whether she knew a lot about the President's decisions. I asked what proof there is for this being a 'feminist cult', and that she was dictating the said decisions.
A world leader being in a cult is certainly cause for concern, but that does not establish your other claims. "What evidence is there that this was a feminist cult?" != "CULTS ARE GOOD".