The cycle would continue, as long as women have the vote, they will vote emotionally for communism, immigration, and the destruction of boundaries. They do this in an attempt to foster chaos to ensure a cleaner gene pool.
Your plan is to report them to the authorities who you already know will do nothing about it except put your name on a list of White nationalist terrorists?
It is because royalty is now basically a popularity contest because they have no real power. They're not rulers. They're stage pieces who present a perfectly curated public face designed to offend the least people.
Either one. Any system of universal suffrage. Any system that gives the wicked a voice in governance, a say in what the rest of us do.
The right to vote is not, as the liars have claimed for the past century, the right to self determination. What it actually is, is the right to determine what other people are allowed to do.
And that is a power that does not belong to the proles and the parasites.
In all cases, the idea is to filter out the non-responsibles. As in, let the useful decide. The useful, the responsible: the assets. Those who contribute in tax more than they take is a better measure because it includes all the ways people can be useful, while land ownership and veterancy are merely two arbitrary criteria. The 20-something with a steady job deserves his voice.
In this instance my concern is to give the franchise of voting not merely to the productive, but to those with an interest in the long term benefit to, and continuation of, a civilized, moral, Christian society.
The productive should not, ever, be slaves to the parasite class, and as such net negative taxpayers just simply shouldn't vote, I agree. But with the idea above it's more about time preferences and having something invested in society. With child rearing families, their kids, and with veterans, having put their own ass on the line.
We're speaking similar things with different conclusions. I was implying that people with income ARE invested in society and its long-term evolution, in its general majority. If tax negatives couldn't vote today with today's populations, most pressing political issues would get fixed.
This is why Brown countries will always be third world. They're just not genetically cut out for living in a lawful society. Add to that our institutions encouraging and allowing them to get away with this and it leads even more rapidly to the decline of the West. And then Blacks, even middle class ones, will act like Whites not wanting to live around this are somehow the evil ones. These people are all civilizational cancer.
And what could they have done? Someone ODing on random drugs isn't treatable with basic first aid treatment. The only thing that they could do was wait on an ambulance which they did.
That's called jury tampering and is illegal. Pretty sure that's a federal crime. Time to report this POS.
The cycle would continue, as long as women have the vote, they will vote emotionally for communism, immigration, and the destruction of boundaries. They do this in an attempt to foster chaos to ensure a cleaner gene pool.
There used to be; America fought a war against it and saved the communists from that very nation...
In this (socialist) country, "conservatives got the bullet too".
Only a crime if you get caught.
Tl note: this means if it's enforced
Do you really think the law is going to do anything about this? We wouldn't be in this mess if the legal system wasn't fucked to begin with
Your plan is to report them to the authorities who you already know will do nothing about it except put your name on a list of White nationalist terrorists?
Democracy is a farce.
Every day I become more and more of a radical traditionalist and understand the concept of divine kings better.
Mandate of Heaven.
It is because royalty is now basically a popularity contest because they have no real power. They're not rulers. They're stage pieces who present a perfectly curated public face designed to offend the least people.
Either one. Any system of universal suffrage. Any system that gives the wicked a voice in governance, a say in what the rest of us do.
The right to vote is not, as the liars have claimed for the past century, the right to self determination. What it actually is, is the right to determine what other people are allowed to do.
And that is a power that does not belong to the proles and the parasites.
What a joke it is that someone chosen in a popularity contest gets to tell me what I can and can't do.
What about voting being only for the tax-positive?
I'm honestly more of the Heinlen bent about it. Land owning families(meaning you'd have to live there and have children), or veterans.
In all cases, the idea is to filter out the non-responsibles. As in, let the useful decide. The useful, the responsible: the assets. Those who contribute in tax more than they take is a better measure because it includes all the ways people can be useful, while land ownership and veterancy are merely two arbitrary criteria. The 20-something with a steady job deserves his voice.
In this instance my concern is to give the franchise of voting not merely to the productive, but to those with an interest in the long term benefit to, and continuation of, a civilized, moral, Christian society.
The productive should not, ever, be slaves to the parasite class, and as such net negative taxpayers just simply shouldn't vote, I agree. But with the idea above it's more about time preferences and having something invested in society. With child rearing families, their kids, and with veterans, having put their own ass on the line.
We're speaking similar things with different conclusions. I was implying that people with income ARE invested in society and its long-term evolution, in its general majority. If tax negatives couldn't vote today with today's populations, most pressing political issues would get fixed.
Government by the retarded, for the retarded, of the retarded.
Dudes probably a millionaire thanks to the Floyd family payouts, guess he's got nothing else better to do
Wanna bet the money is almost gone seeing as they have a history of making terrible decisions.
I've got $10 that says the FBI doesn't do a damn thing..
Might as well make it a million, go big when it's a sure bet.
The optimal bet size for a sure thing is one people will take you up on.
True should have gone with a gorillion.
Of course it will, we're not immortal. :)
Just aim for heaven.
If shit really hits the fan. No amount of moneys gonna save this guys face hitting the pavement.
jury tampering should be a capital crime
How long till he blows through his cut of the $27million
This is why Brown countries will always be third world. They're just not genetically cut out for living in a lawful society. Add to that our institutions encouraging and allowing them to get away with this and it leads even more rapidly to the decline of the West. And then Blacks, even middle class ones, will act like Whites not wanting to live around this are somehow the evil ones. These people are all civilizational cancer.
Why?
And what could they have done? Someone ODing on random drugs isn't treatable with basic first aid treatment. The only thing that they could do was wait on an ambulance which they did.
Nuh uh! Muh thin blue line! Muh back the blue!!
T_D was banhammered on reddit for, among other claims, "Promoting anti-police violence."
👮