I have written about it before, but it is worth making a post over. In the game of victim olympics the historical Trump card lies with a white ethnicity. This would be anyone with Slavic heritage. The word slave is based on a derogatory term for the Slavic people. This also means that anytime uses the term slave to refer to a owned person they are denigrating Slavic people. Any POC using the term slave is racially appropriating the pain and suffering of the Slavic people. This is deliberate, continued ethnic discrimination against a global and national minority. Anyone with Slavic heritage can use this to “punch up” against any other ethnicities. Also, since Slavic people have had multiple genocide attempts from “POC” and have been mass “enslaved” by them to the point the definition of owning another person is actually a slur or descriptor of Slavic people it neuters their own claim of oppression. Make them die on their word salad hill they continue to force on us.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Irish as well as English criminals were the first slaves in America.
They were worked to death so that the owners didnt have to worry about freeing them.
Do it. That would be pretty funny
This won't work because they don't follow their own standards and they have no logical consistency. They call Polish people "colonizers" unironically. They blame America for the entirety of the transatlantic slave trade despite it being 100% European powers behind it.
They'll just ignore you and shout you down, calling you racist.
Oh, the Dene would love that (their language is called Slavey, and the Cree call them Slaveys as well. Guess what the Dene used to be in relation to other tribes, like, oh, the Cree.) They're what the Slave Lakes were named after ...
Here's a factoid you can bring up any time some dindus begin with muh slavery: no new slaves were brought into the US after 1807.
Kind of knocks back their stupid "muh racist country" a bit when we stopped importing slaves nearly 60 years before the Civil War. Little history fact that's never ever brought up.
It doesn't work, you can't win by playing by the enemy's rules. Trust me, I've seen people try.
/u/Gizortnik occasionally longposts about how leftism is an ideology of war, hopefully he'll be here shortly to explain it better than I can.
GAH! I'm sorry I'm late!
/u/Ahaus667 should have already heard my spcheel on the innate nature of Leftism.
The only utility is hitting Leftists with their own word salad is to knock them off their game before you attack. The problem with making a white ethnic argument is that it could generate a "shut the fuck up mayo" level response where everything you say is dismissed out of hand because you're white.
Instead, I'd say play the Asian or "fellow whites" card.
Ask them kind of leading questions that walk them into a trap in their own ideology. Because their ideology is really only based on power, they don't actually know any of the scripture and won't cite anything. Memorize some key passages that make them uncomfortable and force them to answer questions badly.
You could lead them into a discussion about how they would prioritize which Asian groups (Indian v. Chinese, v. Korean, v. Pakistani v. Indian), or alternatively, try to make them identify which races are innately "white passing". Definitely drag judaism into the discussion, and focus on the fact that jews are white, and how anti-whiteness is antisemetic.
If you're clever about it, the Asian issue can be brought up the same with blacks. It's a well understood fact among black Americans that, they all kind of hate each other and that Pan-Africanism is a bullshit lie that Leftists tell. Black Carribeans, West Africans, Ethiopians, Somalis, Brazilians, and Black Americans don't really get along, and there's a very stupid game of "who's really black" that gets played. If you guessed: "The black Americans pretend that they are what real blacks are because they were slaves and shit, and this pisses all the other blacks off and causes racial division... you are correct, how did you guess?!!"
But again, this is only so that you can distract them, assert that their entire concept is untenable to normies. And this only works with the stupid ones.
What you instead need to do. in most environments anyway, is re-assert your independence regardless of attempts at social stigma with moral conviction.
Typically, this will end up with you getting a ton of heat, but being an inspiration to some other people, and bowling straight fucking through the Leftists, because your goal has to be to get past them and build civilization without them.
IIRC, u/Ahaus667 is Polish, so he could try playing the "Poles are honorary negroes because Haiti" card.
However, I don't find trying to argue with SJWs productive at all. You can get them uncomfortable all you want, and it can be funny, but in the end, when you corner one, they just revert to calling you a bigot. That can be fun too, especially if you openly acknowledge it ("Yes, I am, now what?"), but ultimately it's just a waste of time. SJWism is a cult, you can't reason with these people.
It depends on your objective in regards to who your are talking to.
All can be done, but all require different approaches.
Slavs look like the word sounds.
Oh look, a racist
Crying out in pain as you strike me.
Tell me, what type of whet stone do you use for all that edge?
Tell me Slavs don’t look like the word sounds.