The relgious pro-life side would be just as afraid. Simply developing the technology amounts to human experimentation. Your research specimens are human embryos, and you're going to kill a lot of them. The ones you don't kill might reach stages of life where you're legally unable to terminate them before you realize you've created a kid who's gonna die of cancer at age 6.
Do you think they will ever allow it to be applied to humans?
If the technology is there, and the end result is comparable to natural birth, they will have to tie themselves in knots trying to explain why it can't be allowed. All arguments beyond that will basically boil down to saying females are only fit for breeding and that any other purpose they serve is sub-optimal.
We can probably expect to see this come to fruition within our lifetimes. Only ethics and legal red tape will stop it.
Most of the moral problems are not problems if you don't think abortion is bad.
If a late term abortion is perfectly legal, then what's the argument against experimentation up to that age of gestation? There isn't one. Not one that has any legal logic behind it, anyway.
A society that allows abortion will have a harder time keeping the lid on this.
Wasn't trying to swing your opinion in either direction. It was merely an observation that it's a lot harder to come up with a coherent argument against this research if you also allow women to terminate inconvenient or unwanted pregnancies on a whim.
I agree, but the thing about humans is that coherent arguments are not what gets us going, appeal to either straight chemistry or more complex process in emotion does.
Our "betters" must be on suicide watch.
Without their biological necessity, even the tradcucks will cease caring.
I've always thought the technology has been slow to develop because abortionists are afraid of the implications.
The relgious pro-life side would be just as afraid. Simply developing the technology amounts to human experimentation. Your research specimens are human embryos, and you're going to kill a lot of them. The ones you don't kill might reach stages of life where you're legally unable to terminate them before you realize you've created a kid who's gonna die of cancer at age 6.
This is Alpha Centauri shit.
Only difference is the religious pro-life side has no power. The fundies would ban it if they could.
It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks, and become one with all the people.
Do you think they will ever allow it to be applied to humans? They will campaign against it like mad. It will be funny to see them turn religious.
If the technology is there, and the end result is comparable to natural birth, they will have to tie themselves in knots trying to explain why it can't be allowed. All arguments beyond that will basically boil down to saying females are only fit for breeding and that any other purpose they serve is sub-optimal.
We can probably expect to see this come to fruition within our lifetimes. Only ethics and legal red tape will stop it.
Given the sheer scale of moral problems with just developing this... will it ever be there in public eye?
Most of the moral problems are not problems if you don't think abortion is bad.
If a late term abortion is perfectly legal, then what's the argument against experimentation up to that age of gestation? There isn't one. Not one that has any legal logic behind it, anyway.
A society that allows abortion will have a harder time keeping the lid on this.
Sure, if it will actually be similar to abortion in the sense of getting embryos... errr, donated.
Are you trying to sell me even more on abortion? No need to, my position on it is already pretty utilitarian.
Wasn't trying to swing your opinion in either direction. It was merely an observation that it's a lot harder to come up with a coherent argument against this research if you also allow women to terminate inconvenient or unwanted pregnancies on a whim.
I agree, but the thing about humans is that coherent arguments are not what gets us going, appeal to either straight chemistry or more complex process in emotion does.
Cultural appropriation or religious reasons will be their go to.
ITS ABOUT TIME
Welcome to the Brave New World or, as HG Wells' calls it in his eponymous book, the New World Order.
Dream TheImpossible1s dream.
Hmmm where is this headed? The 4ch Nazis say they want to do this so they can breed the aryan super race...
That would require the Channers to be in charge.
They already did this with sheep, several years ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt7twXzNEsQ
Cat girls for domestic co-habitation when?
Artificial wombs will liberate us from the tyranny of the vagina. I welcome it.
relax, the level of difficulty here is way too high. Somethings just can't be replicated, and artificial wombs are definitely up there on the list.
they are doing it to make trannies real. this must never happen